2007-02-01 18:25:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Mathematics
The Beatles
2007-02-01 18:28:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The usual attempt to "prove" that math is wrong, often using division by zero methods, but there is also a geometric trick that makes 64 appear to be the same as 65 (unless you check how the exact heights should be by applying the theorem of intersecting lines.
Take square pattern paper, and draw a square 8*8 squares.
Cut it so that you get a rectangle 3*8 and a rectangle 5*8.
Cut the 3*8 rectangle diagonally.
Cut the 5*8 rectangle so that you get two trapezons with edges 3 and 5 squares long.
Reorder the four fragments: attach the 3 squares edge of one triangle each to one of the three squares edges of the trapezons so you get something looking like a triangle, then fit the two resulting triangles together so that they look like a rectangle of 5*13 squares.
This looks like it might work. However, if you construct this exactly and look closely, there will be a parallelogram on the diagonal of the rectangle which has the area of one square.
2007-02-01 18:37:17 · answer #2 · answered by jorganos 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
wow that is the oddest problem ever, so i think you'll be recieving the oddest answers ever
1 + 1 + 1 = 3
there are 4 numbers total
4 ^ 3 = 64
lmao
2007-02-01 19:33:08 · answer #3 · answered by Pure 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
one plus one plus one is three.
One and one and one is can be related to sixty four.
2007-02-01 19:50:32 · answer #4 · answered by Cancerian 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Couples that have threesomes rarely make it to their 64th anniversary.
2007-02-01 18:30:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Beatles. Don't try to play me!
2007-02-02 07:21:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cuz we all have to come together while we're fixing a fuse... who could ask for more?
2007-02-01 18:38:46 · answer #7 · answered by rick m 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
is this a math question?? john lennon vs ringo???
2007-02-01 18:30:54 · answer #8 · answered by doctorhector 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋