Rush has never, ever, lied about anything, nor misinformed anyone
He simply offers an opinion based upon the evidence readily available
Not to mention he is an entertainer, not a politician
2007-02-01 18:04:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
5⤋
What kind of question is this? Why are you trying to make comparisons? I'll bet you are one of those who have bought into mass medias vietnam/iraq comparison, which is far from the truth. I've never heard Rush tell a lie. Rush doesn't speak for anyone but himself. If you are looking for Bush's minister of information, that would be his press secretary Tony Snow.
2007-02-01 18:30:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
If I say no, will you read the rest of my comment?
Tariq Azziz was the mouthpeice for Sadaam Hussein and for the defunct Baath party. He told blatent lies in an effort to keep Sadaam in power.
Rush Limbaugh spouses his own opinions to keep an audience listening (to make more money in advertising). The opinions just happen to be conservative and that sells well with a large portion of Americans. Many disagree with him and accuse him of being Bush's mouthpeice, but he was there long before Bush (since 1989).
Hope this helps, Great Question!
2007-02-01 18:11:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Drop Zone 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Rush works the window of the drive-thru media. He is hilarious to listen to. If I'm in a bad mood, I listen to his show and laugh till I cry. I did like him better when he was on drugs though.
2007-02-01 18:17:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Speedracer 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes very much so. Both have a talent for spinning the truth... meaning they tell partial truths and leave out necessary facts by selectiion.
2007-02-03 01:04:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's difficult to discuss political issues with someone that doesn't even have the good sense to turn the caps lock off.
2007-02-01 18:04:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by VoodooPunk 4
·
3⤊
2⤋
Limbaugh has a far greater audience, many of whom are close enough to the edge that he can inspire them to violence.
2007-02-01 18:18:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Great question.. do you mean a 'bumbling idiot'?
I would find it extremely difficult to argue with your assertion.
2007-02-01 18:10:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Rush? don't think so...
2007-02-01 18:25:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by no one here gets out alive 6
·
0⤊
0⤋