We all know that Bonds has NEVER been a public appearance guy, so maybe it isn't surprising that he didn't like that clause in his new contract - but is his refusal to sign because of the "possible criminal charges" almost an admission of guilt to steroid use?
He has a chance to pass Hank Aaron in all time HRs this season - HE SHOULD make puclic appearances! And as for the possible criminal charges - if he has been clean and he is indeed innocent, why should he care if that clause is in his contract anyway?
2007-02-01 17:32:22 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Baseball
who cares? the entire history of BASEBALL...
2007-02-02 06:21:34 · update #1
I think it's poor form to sign a contract and then immediately start saying that parts of it are invalid.
2007-02-01 17:35:58 · answer #1 · answered by JerH1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
His new contract is all the same, but the clause was added. I think as a SF Giants fan, I promote the use of that clause, I don't want Barry to screw us over in the long run. He is almost there.
2007-02-02 14:11:08 · answer #2 · answered by Kevin L 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jeff is right Barroid( O.J.Simpson) Bonds is a Whiney, Baby.and should just QUIT right NOW and save his Family a lot of SHAME....Oh thats right Barry is ALL ABOUT Barry.. I wonder if he knows that outside S.F. he is looked at as a COMPLETE IDIOT!!!!! Other players have NO respect for this POSER!!!
2007-02-02 08:18:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Barry Lamar Bonds is as guilty as O.J. Simpson. He should suffer the same fate as Barbaro.
2007-02-02 01:36:26 · answer #4 · answered by Craig G 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Whiney! Baby! Who cares!
2007-02-02 03:01:49 · answer #5 · answered by Jeff 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Bonds is guilty as charged.
2007-02-02 02:38:12 · answer #6 · answered by Tenn Gal 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋