Is the United Nations an Asset or Liability for Todays World?

Answer 1

It has become a liability.

It was originally intended as a means for the more modern, peaceful nations to bring the less sophisticated governments into a global arena to work out their problems and to learn how to provide more humane systems of government.

The UN has been overrun by the sheer numbers of bad rulers and has become a corrupt body. It is now a case of the smaller, more corrupt nations running the show.

Answer 2

It has been a liability for years. It was a recycled idea that did not work the first time. An army that has no soldiers of its own has no power. An army told not to fire even when fired upon unless certain protocols are met has no power. People do not need "peace keeping' armies, if there is peace why the army? OK - I know the answer to that but I hope you understand what my point was too.
They have no real power& no money of their own. Plus, fewer nations are listening to them - Iraq, Iran, Syria, N Korea, China & that is just a few who defied them.

Answer 3

My house is definitely an asset. the alternative to possessing is renting....that is particularly spending assorted funds each and each month that may in no way be recouped. Renters spend 10s of hundreds of greenbacks a 300 and sixty 5 days on hire. we actually own quite a few apartment homes and those are factors besides. The hire that somebody else is blowing is particularly making the charge for us and leaving a small quantity of earnings on precise of that. We offered our abode 8 years in the past and have it on the marketplace for basically over two times what we paid for it. regardless of the "shoppers industry" that at the instant exists we are able to clean a 6 determine earnings while it sells. I actual evaluate possessing a house an asset.

Answer 4

It is a liability at this point. It just gives world leaders a chance to back stab and lie to each other on a grand scale and face to face. It is a far cry from the League of Nations.

Answer 5

Liability to the United States (the way that they applauded Hugo Chavez calling George W. Bush a devil).

Asset to the rest of the world (I assume the UN has some emergency aid programs that help 3rd world countries)

Maybe it's time we help the UN relocate somewhere that we don't have to be hospitable to foreign hostile nations (Switzerland maybe since they are always neutral?)

Answer 6

Under ideal circumstances it would be an asset but in today's world its useless. I'm not sure I would necessarily call it a liability but nothing gets done through it and everyone ignores it so why bother.

Answer 7

It is an asset. It was never intended as a world governmental body, but rather as a common forum through which the sovereign nations of the world could meet and exchange ideas and policies. The UN may not be perfect, but the world would be worse off without it.

Answer 8

they do play musical chairs, and at that point we will know?
You are asking a question that is subject to change? United Nations is needed for reasons of World Peace and Trade.
They are an asset of course but if there are those like Chavez, and that Iranian blue turban guy, then we need to make changes, just turn on the music then you will see them prance. Just grab their chair out from underneath them when the music stops. Easy as that.

Answer 9

its definitely a liability since its no longer the u.n. it should be called ameri-gland since it is so greatly manipulated by america and england. the rest of the world don't stand a chance to get justice unless they side with one of these two countries who will then side with each other. Its their way or you are put on some sort of watch list.

Answer 10

Liability. We are one of the biggest financial contributers and I think we should pull out and set up a select group that is capable of doing what the UN was intended to do. Leave out the corrupting influences that have taken over and make it work.