2007-02-01 15:53:55 · 16 answers · asked by j_mang 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
their conduct in stopping the inquest into her death speaks for itself. Only those who didnt want the truth to come out would have acted like that.
2007-02-02 00:21:06 · answer #1 · answered by polldiva 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The Royal family had no reason to kill Diana. The scandal about the divorce was over, everybody knew about Charles and Camilla and Diana was moving on with her life. She was no threat to them. Diana was not going to marry Dodi. She told a friend so. There was no conspiracy to keep foreigners out of the palace, because Diana wasn't going to marry one at that time.
2007-02-02 09:18:15 · answer #2 · answered by Debra D 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
she died while her automobile lost administration and crashed right into a wall. there is not any reason to presume her motive force intentionally lost administration of the vehicle nor develop into her motive force a member of the royal relatives. She additionally might have survived the crash fairly particularly interior the case that it develop into no longer without postpone elaborately deliberate. everybody isn't murdered via freak injuries, they might usually be shot, poisoned, besides the fact that.
2016-11-02 02:44:01 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you think the British Royal Family was into such tactics?
Ever consider it might have been OTHERS who wanted Dodi killed because he was too friendly with the British?
2007-02-01 16:19:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why did your Aunt Petunia drop you on your head when you were 2 causing permanent brain damage? Both questions suggest facts not in evidence, but at least my presumption is more likely.
2007-02-02 06:11:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Dont be pursuaded by the media. The accident was an ill fated event that costs life of two very kind people.
2007-02-01 17:13:03 · answer #6 · answered by trykindness 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Dumb cluck. If they had REALLY wanted her killed, there would have been far less circumstantial evidence to link them with it. And no, it wasn't a double bluff.
Yes, her death suited them quite well, but that's not evidence.
2007-02-02 01:15:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
DIANA WILL LIVE ON IN THE HEART OF ALL
2007-02-01 20:03:03 · answer #8 · answered by bev 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If your assumption was true, don't you think that a better, quieter, less controversial way would have been found? I think you read too much fiction.
2007-02-02 04:33:00 · answer #9 · answered by Duffer 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why would you ask such an utterly silly question? They did nothing of the kind.
2007-02-01 15:57:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋