what is the democrats plan for terrorism?

Question

They have no plan at all. Most of them voted for the war in iraq and as soon as they thought they could score political points from opposing it here they go.

Their plan is to run and hide. They pretend now they want to "go after" whatever cave bin ladin is in. OH ya? so they are now willing to take the military into Pakistan, AN AUTONOMOUS country and take that country over against their will?

They cant have it both ways.


Its clear they have no plan except maybe asking al-queda to join a softball team and be friends or perhaps come spray paint the capital building with the rest of Americas enemies, the leftists themselves.




and thats a memo

haha lol one libtard goes back to Truman to show the last time a democrat wasnt weak on defense.

then cassandra the next democrap states u can not go to war against terrorism. i rest my case.

"g" clearly can not understand sarcasm. the autonomous country argument is what the liberals used for iraq, a dictator run, invading menance to the world. they would say the same about pakistan or afghanistan or kuwait or whatever country osama ran his *** into.

and thats a memo

no. its the democraps that say it "g" man, and u have so little mind to blow, its ok if it goes

Answer 1

Send Jane Fonda over there! I wonder if they would let her sit on their weapons.

Answer 2

why do Republicans always defend Osama? "oh we can't go after him".. "he's in an autonomous country and we can't take them over"...

he attacked us? remember 9-11?

THAT'S THE ACTUAL ONE REASON WE SHOULD ATTACK AN AUTONOMOUS COUNTRY... when they are harboring people that attacked us... or are they "looking for him"... yeah, doing a bang up job of that...

what doesn't Pakistan have that Iraq did? A military dicator... nope, they both had that... WMD... oh, actually only Pakistan has that... terrorists running around... actually Pakistan probably has many more than Iraq ever had or even has now...

but, Republicans cry "YOU CAN'T DO THAT" when you say "go after Osama"?

don't you remember 9-11?

EDIT: you may be sarcastic... but I've talked to other conservatives that are dead serious saying these things... and it's crazy... either way you cut it, if you ask me... it blows my mind...

Answer 3

you will see the democrats substitute the form greater advantageous than any republican ever concept approximately changing it. Sitting in front of our new Congress, below living house Speaker Nancy Pelosi, there's a notion to designate churches, pastors, non secular denominations, public interest org., and different non-earnings communities as "lobbyists." in case you talk out against homosexuality, abortion or any element God calls ungodly you would be fined $one hundred,000.00 or 6 to 10 years in reformatory. The shape has continually suggested that government can't get in contact in faith so as that a church of england would possibly never ensue in u.s.. it incredibly is not democrats or republicans as much because it incredibly is the those that the ACLU has placed in workplace. Being from San Francisco, Nancy Pelosi might prefer to pass against each little thing in SF to vote against homosexuality. to respond to your question, the recent Congress does not be conscious of what to do with terrorism to any extent further than your previous Congress knew. one element that i desire is - i don't desire terrorist in u.s. back. And neither the dems nor the reps can assure that

Answer 4

The Democratic Party remains in a state of denial in regards to terrorism and they are instead focussed on their individual career aspirations.
This is rather shortsighted due to the fact that if terrorism is allowed to flourish unopposed, eventually America will come under Islamic rule....Then where will their Careers be.
The Democrats as well as our RINO's have not considered this. Otherwise they would not be Pimping the Country and our Freedom like they are.

Answer 5

I think you're living under a misconception that democrats are weak will people on defense. I do remember a Truman dropping two atomic bombs in defense of our country. Tough choices are made by tough people regardless of party. I know it stings for conservatives watching Bush's Foreign policy falling apart and you're not seeing the troops being handed flowers by the Iraqi children...but you need to consider admitting this was screwed from the beginning and time to start thinking about something new.

Answer 6

1) Surrender.
2) Collaborate.

Answer 7

Laughing Man,Truman was an old school dem. The left would never elect a strong dem like that today.

Answer 8

Hug the terrorist. Give top secret missile technology to terrorist for anti-aggression agreement. Watch as the terrorist take over Europe. Attack the terrorist, lose millions of soldiers, and declare victory as the terrorist escape to South America.

Answer 9

Democrats I am waiting to hear their plan. LIBERALS will just hide as always and hope it goes away. They always remind me of a little kid hiding under their blanket! If I can't see you, then you can't see me.

Answer 10

Slap their hand, tell them they are bad, Maybe sanction them.

Ah yes sit around and sing Kum Ba Ya!

Answer 11

This advice just came thru from Donald Rumsfeld:

Take the war to foreign soil! (Cuba maybe?)
Invade somewhere (note; needs to be short name) and invite terrorists to give it their best shot!
Why? If we don't, 'terrorists will follow us here' and we don't want them tired after a long journey or anything.


Sorry; that's already been done......