2007-02-01 15:04:43 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Science & Mathematics ➔ Chemistry
And what is your question about these two agents?
2007-02-01 15:07:27 · answer #1 · answered by Dave_Stark 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sarin certainly is and I suppose mustard gas could be, but it is pretty obsolete. Yeah there were some WMD in Iraq and a lot more than the piddly stashes that we actually found. What bothers me more than anything is that just about everyone believed Saddam had a massice stash of WMD, everyone. After they failed to show up week after week, more and more flip floppers started showing up saying they never thought there were any there. MALARKY! They were there, there has never been any documentation of their destruction or transfer and everyone knows what the scoop was BEFORE the war. The leftists cut and run crowd needs to stop lying about the whole deal, it's disingenuous. And this Joe Wilson thing that everyone lies about, WTF is up with that? It is positively documented that Saddam was in fact making an end run for nigerian uranium and Joe Wlson damned well knew it. The Elite Media seems to think some trumped up GOTCHYA story about a self-outed CIA desk jockey is more important than actually reporting the truth. What poppycock!
2016-03-29 00:56:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take sarin. This is a nerve toxin so should be relatively painless. Mustard gas or chlorine gas reacts with the water in your lungs to create hydrochloric acid. Effectively dissolving your respiratory system.
Ouch!
2007-02-01 21:08:24 · answer #3 · answered by Dante 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You're really into technical terms you picked up from TV huh.
2007-02-01 17:54:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer fart gas myself, but only if it's my own.
2007-02-01 15:11:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
For what?
2007-02-01 15:12:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
hay
2007-02-02 03:16:14 · answer #7 · answered by dream theatre 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋