"Your either with us or against us" not only applies to "Liberals" who oppose the President, but now is being used against one of your own, conservative Rep. Sen. John Warner. Does this mean that even Republicans are not safe under Bush?
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/01/washington/01cong.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
2007-02-01 13:57:30 · 11 answers · asked by michaelsan 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
White House spokesman Tony Snow mentioned Osama bin Laden will be encouraged by people like Sen. Warner!
2007-02-01 14:12:22 · update #1
Bush is NOT a Republican. He is a parasite who latched onto the party dumb enough to take him.
2007-02-01 14:03:41 · answer #1 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Sen Warner is a honorable man. He always put the country first and he loves this nation.
That said, those conservatives still live in the zombie state, should put on a 30% T-shirt. Because these are the 30% in today's poll.
2007-02-01 22:05:41 · answer #2 · answered by Bill H 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
First, neither party is "dumb" as was suggested above.
The really "dumb" voters are the ones who vote straight party tickets! Shouldn't "we" as a people, be voting for the best qualified person, regardless of sex, party affiliation, religious beliefs, race, etc.???
Both (read ALL) parties in question make mistakes. As human beings, we all do. We believe in the wrong people to help us. We support folk who hide their true ideals!
This does not make any of us wrong! Only Human!
Our government needs an overhaul! It needs folk willing to lead us into the right way of life and folk to lead others in the same direction. (Okay, getting to far ahead of myself here, sorry).
We all must answer unto ourselves in the end. We must now ask, are our decissions justified and proper!
The Ol' Sasquatch Ã
2007-02-01 22:17:20 · answer #3 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is what the President said in the same article:
"“Look, I understand. It’s a difficult time on Capitol Hill,” he said. “There are people who are doubtful about whether or not the strategy that I’ve come up with and decided upon as commander-in-chief will work.”
I didn't see anyone accusing Sen. Warner of aiding the enemy in that article. So I guess I don't feel anything about it, as it is a non-issue.
2007-02-01 22:08:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
Republicans are safe under Bush.
Republicans AND democrats are NOT safe under a liberal leader.
To your link, so what, your kind has been aiding the enemy from the get go. Only the liberal party doesn't hold them accountable.
2007-02-01 22:12:14 · answer #5 · answered by patrioticpeladac 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not to bad, but the republicans won't kick him out of the party like the democrats did Lieberman for supporting the war. Just goes to show that tolerance leans the other way these days
2007-02-01 22:06:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
It means that some of the Republicans are either wising up.. OR more than likely just want to ensure they do not go down with the Bush ship...
2007-02-01 22:01:22 · answer #7 · answered by Debra H 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋
I bet they start making up stories about his military service, like they did John Kerry and James Webb.
2007-02-01 22:03:19 · answer #8 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
They have you fooled too, lol. Democrats, Republicans, there is no difference.
2007-02-01 22:03:13 · answer #9 · answered by seecho 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
i don't care wht party your in, you support me and my friends (i'm in the army reserves till i finish college) or get out of office
2007-02-01 22:02:47 · answer #10 · answered by fla5232 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋