He has drawn the lines against US's enemies and has shown supremacy in wars, received mass criticism yet still popular. Is he a great leader? or a war lord?
2007-02-01 13:40:45 · 14 answers · asked by Kyo_kusanagi 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Does popular mean that 2% of the U.S like him? He sucks at a being a leader because he is so stupid and stubborn.
O god I've read some dumb answers before but some of these top the chart.
2007-02-01 13:43:32 · answer #1 · answered by alexmojo2 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
At best (IMHO) Mister Bush is a puppet. While he appears to have some control over such situations, He does not. It is more likely that organizations 'like' the Trilateral Commission are behind the network.
Our presidents are only figure-heads, nothing more! Look at what happened to JFK, because he choose to stand up against them ... again, IMHO!
So, No! He is not a great leader! And No, he is not a war lord! He is but a man doing what he is told to do!
"A king is not saved by his great army,
A warrior is not delivered by his great strength,
The war horse is a vain hope for victory,
And by it's great might,
It cannot save"
Psalms 33 - 16, 17
The Ol' Sasquatch Ü
2007-02-01 13:56:56 · answer #2 · answered by Ol' Sasquatch 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldn't say he's stupid, he's actually very intelligent. He thinks he's doing whats best for the country but unfortunately, men and women are getting killed. Yes, his stubbornness is a great factor here also. With the Democrat's now in control of the House and Senate (because of Bush's UN-popularity) I think he's going to become even more protective of what he can really control. I'm a registered Republican and greatly admire our president but at the same time am disappointed in his handling of the war. Every time he speaks of it there's talk of what his purpose is, then talk of pulling troops out, and later on when he thinks we forgot, talk of putting more troops back in. Theres no need for us to stay there forever, it's all about oil when it comes down to the nitty-gritty of it all. Saddam's gone, from what I hear Bin Laden must not be too far behind because of natural causes, we're catching Al Quida people more frequently. When's it going to end, I want revenge for 9/11 no more no less than anyone else,and for us all to be protected from terrorism but whens the war going to end. Seems like one way or another parents are going to have to explain why mommy or daddy isn't coming home.
2007-02-01 13:58:42 · answer #3 · answered by princessforever1 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If 9/11 was a true act of foreign terrorists... then yes he has protected America well since then.. I don't know why Iraq was invaded since respectably most countries are in the process or already have created Wmd however, Saddam had to go for different reasons...Bush did something which wasn't on his campaign list... secure America with oil for 30 years
2007-02-01 13:48:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
george bush is a great leader to us all if we steer him and direct him by firing a whole lot of emails and letters
and also george bush has experience in war he is military man
I rank him in second to general patton
the reason why war in this generation is expensive george plans are to restore what he has torndown all others have not
that leaves the enemy with a bitter and revengeful plight 9/11
critism is from ignorance because george bush friends are irag friends iraq is not his ememy ...his father supported peace efforts and support under the carter adminstration for the iraqs when isreal was at war with iraq late 77
2007-02-01 13:57:04 · answer #5 · answered by Waddetree 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Great leader definetly, he's takin a lot of heat on Iraq but not a single government on the planet before the war thought he didn't have weapons, they all thought he did even Saddam's own men. My English class was on the Iraq war, im in college (so i have to actually do the research and know the facts), and even if Saddam didn't actively have them he was actively ready to build them like a beaver would build a dam, he had the material and the people all he had do was say the word. Besides would we rather have kookoo Al Gore as president? his wife became a super drunk right after her husband lost the election, thts character for you, or Kerry who polled France for everything it seemed, i'm srry i aint french now am i, i'm an american, deal with it, In 20-30 years when the history books are being written George W. Bush will be hailed as one of the greatest leaders in History of the U.S.
2007-02-01 13:51:06 · answer #6 · answered by fla5232 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I hate the democrats, but no, he is not a great leader. He may or may not be wrong in what he is doing, history will judge that. But he is terrible at conveying why he is doing it. A great or natural leader inspires people to follow them, and he just doesn't.
2007-02-01 14:17:39 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Saving million of the poorest in Africa with the aid of PEPFAR and espresso-cost HIV/AIDS drugs and clinicians/training. until now PEPFAR, drugs have been very almost inconceivable and HIV/AIDS develop right into a death sentence. whilst there remains no therapy, with undemanding availability of drugs human beings can nonetheless stay finished lives regardless of the diagnosis. He stored an entire era of Africans. humorous, maximum human beings do no longer even communicate approximately that, although that is probable his best accomplishment.
2016-11-02 02:30:36 · answer #8 · answered by atalanta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only a great leader would stand by his own beliefs under heavy criticism.
2007-02-01 13:50:41 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
NO! and most of the people that vote dont vote because they know anything they vote by the government party they are for or some other stupid reason meaning not many people like him and its going to stay that way...
2007-02-01 13:49:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋