I don't give a crap what's between their legs. It's what between their ears that counts, and hopefully what's between their ears is the brains to know that a large number of us want limited government.
2007-02-01 13:35:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheOnlyBeldin 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
A Woman
2007-02-01 21:33:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by ♥Lin 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Whomever is more qualified should be the president. Whether that be a man or a woman is left to be seen...
2007-02-01 21:34:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by julez 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
men, countries will not listen to a country with a woman as leader, and the Bible says, women are really not to be in such positions a women is not the head of her husband,it would contradict natural laws, A husband is supposed to be the head of the house,big mistake for a country or people to want a woman to lead them, it is something like an oxymoron, maybe we better get off that word, it is over used
2007-02-01 21:41:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by chinpingmei 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Depends on the qualifications. Both are equal. I would like to see a woman in the white house for a change. Hillary Clinton..no!
2007-02-01 21:34:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
A Woman...Hillary!
2007-02-02 00:18:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Michelle 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think a woman can defend us just as good as a man from terrorist. This one will be hard to swallow with the male conservative.
2007-02-01 21:38:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Man:
Less Sensitive, so they are focused
Woman:
To fight for other rights that haven't yet been done yet, since men are always president.
2007-02-01 21:39:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by LoveQuestionaire 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Woman! This world needs more compassion and sensitivity.
2007-02-01 21:34:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by broadwayaprilandtiffany 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
we already know what jerks man are so let's give the girls a run at it.
2007-02-04 01:54:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋