besides zell miller and joe liberman
2007-02-01 13:28:21 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They were all for it before they were against it!
2007-02-01 13:51:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
The two listed are the only ones, the others blame Bush and some even deny the threat
2007-02-01 22:24:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I recall that Bush said he was no longer interested in bin Laden. That showed that Bush doesn't seem to care about a REAL terrorist that inflicted REAL harm on the US.
The cons backed him on. I know the cons love PNAC and the Haliburton profits, raising the terror alert level to keep the sheep in fear and reading the email of Americans. When did they speak out against terrorism?
2007-02-01 21:39:44 · answer #3 · answered by expose_neocons 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I cant think of one that came out in support of terrorism
2007-02-01 21:44:08 · answer #4 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
They passed bills to enact 911 commission's recomendations which improve airport, port securities and upgrade other security measures. While GOP refused to do that for many years. I guess better security at places where terrorists can enter isn't all that important to GOP.
2007-02-01 21:32:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Every single Dem has spoken out against terrorism.
Opposing a war that creates more terrorists is the highest form of patriotism.
Blind obedience can be treason.
2007-02-01 21:33:50 · answer #6 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I can't remember specifically. I think the general message went something like:
"If we were better people, the terrorists would not hate us. Shame on you bad Americans for making the terrorists attack!"
2007-02-01 21:33:40 · answer #7 · answered by WJ 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Alot of them did until they felt that it would not promote their own personal political aspirations.
2007-02-01 21:32:22 · answer #8 · answered by polly j 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
ME, I have-- lets get get rid of this current President-- who has in the last 6 years giving birth to millions more.
While the United States dithers, a growing Islamic fundamentalist movement linked to al-Qaeda and Pakistani intelligence agencies is steadily converting the strategically located nation of Bangladesh into a new regional hub for terrorist operations that reach into India and Southeast Asia.
With 147 million people, largely Muslim Bangladesh has substantial Hindu and Christian minorities and is nominally a secular democracy. But the ruling Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) struck a Faustian bargain with the fundamentalist party Jamaat-e-Islami five years ago in order to win power.
In return for the votes in Parliament needed to form a coalition government, Prime Minister Khaleda Zia has looked the other way as the Jamaat has systematically filled sensitive civil service, police, intelligence and military posts with its sympathizers, who have in turn looked the other way as Jamaat-sponsored guerrilla squads patterned after the Taliban have operated with increasing impunity in many rural and urban areas.
2007-02-01 21:31:26 · answer #9 · answered by FOX NEWS WATCHER 1 · 4⤊ 7⤋
What is the matter with you? Listen instead of running your mouth. The trouble with you conservatives is you only hear what you want to hear.
2007-02-01 21:37:23 · answer #10 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋