2007-02-01 13:25:26 · 7 answers · asked by thepaladin38 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Why not? He has the courage to stand up for the voters that elected him even when it go's contrary to the party line. He had the guts to take on the party that dumped him and beat them!We need more independent thinking congressmen who will stand up for their values
2007-02-01 13:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Streakin' Deacon 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you're proper. no man or woman in universal historic past, for political figures, received the outright discrimination and vile hatred that she has. not even Dan Quayle were provided that style of treatment and he grow to be, certainly, a vice chairman. because, usually, the communities that should be furious for such sexism and open animosity take position to be on the political team antagonistic to her. you ought to imagine communities like NOW should be thinking how the targeted on habit reflects on American females, yet it truly is not major. it really is all politics. actual, they don't supply a crap about everybody if it would not tournament their time table. apparently they have self assurance it grow to be their hatred for Palin that were given Obama elected, not his platform, because we do hear better hatred for her than help for his rules. i do not trust each thing she says, yet even putting forward it really is sufficient to get people riled. it really is captivating. the international sees a rustic continually harping about "tolerance" behaving the thoroughly opposite, brazenly embracing derogatory labels (encouraging those), each unfavorable rumor (perpetuating those with ecstasy!) and each and each slander someone can concoct. that is a cutting-edge day witch-hunt targeted on a unmarried human being. u . s . a . probably comes for the era of as a rustic of hypocrisy and that is tragic. The elitists decide on to p.c.. on her because she isn't elite. same as continuously. objective someone who's diverse, hit upon a politically maximum ideas-blowing thanks to "do away with them." you understand, they decide on to bother some different person to lead them to sense smart. So, each note, each word, each nod is studied, manipulated and misconstrued to confirm if something unfavorable should be derived from it. i look at politics as an self sufficient, yet am surprised on the lengths to which they're going to flow to spread negativity about her. it really is ideas-blowing. you would imagine she grow to be Charles Manson to justify that element of concern and hatred. and each and each body is salivating with excitement in the journey that they could do or say something to make her look/sound/look undesirable, I mean those who're meant to be respected journalists have stooped to it. It places them in a frenzy.
2016-12-03 08:25:55 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope
2007-02-01 13:29:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
No, but if he insists he should stop being coy and run under the banner he belongs to - Repug.
2007-02-01 13:34:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If he'd give up his senate seat in order to run, I'd support him.
He'd lose, and we'd be rid of him.
2007-02-01 13:40:00 · answer #5 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Of what ?
2007-02-01 14:07:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No way. He's a wh0re.
2007-02-01 13:50:04 · answer #7 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋