For the same reason that Rush Limbaugh was nominated (no lie...he really is a nominee)...activist groups with an agenda trying to get publicity for their cause. The Nobel Peace Prize has become a joke. I lost all respect for the award after Jimmy Carter got it.
2007-02-01 14:17:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Scientific facts are growing at a prodigious clip. We are all subject to the same current of knowledge. Up-dates are not that hard to zero in on. Peace prize for warning of impending doom is an oxymoron, I should get a Peace prize for illuminating our glorious future. There is no doom. Global Warming, cycles, whatever; 2-3 billion years from now will be asking same question, only it will be dam why are we are the last Earthlings. And Earth will forever have its place in Universal history." Are you from Earth? I thought you might be". This is your birth place. Thats update! Thats peace!
2007-02-01 17:16:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rick K 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
The Nobel Committee thinks that his film concerning global warming is important. It is and they are right to think so. Why so sensitive? Maybe because the odds of President Bush ever getting nominated for a peace prize are totally absolutely zero. Now we must endure the righties smearing the Nobel Committee. Yawn. It got old years ago.
2007-02-01 13:22:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by jxt299 7
·
6⤊
3⤋
No, ts, son of Adam. Al Gore was nominated for the Nobel Roman's Pizza prise.
2007-02-01 13:23:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by .... . .-.. .-.. --- 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
I here they nominated Rush Limbaugh for his stance on Drug Abuse and when they realized what they had done they nominated Al Gore so no one will notice.
I guess it would be a comedic situation, now wouldn't it?
2007-02-02 00:16:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I believe it was due to his work for the environment, namely the movie "An Inconvenient Truth". Although that is a guess. I did vote for the Vice President in 2000 and all but I think there were more deserving candidates.
2007-02-01 13:21:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by midjrsy 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
Same reason they chose old stupid Jimmy Carter . They have a left leaning side to them. Besides it makes up for the whopping old Bush put on him.
2007-02-01 13:32:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
MR. VICE PRESIDENT GORE HAS DONE MORE TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC OF THE WORLD TO THE GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS THAT IS NOW SETTLING DOWN UPON US. IF YOU FOLKS THAT DO NOT LIKE MR. PRESIDENT CARTER, THAT IS YOUR OPINON HOWEVER HE HAS DONE MORE FOR HELPING THE DISADVANTAGED IN THIS WORLD THEN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN OUR HISTORY, OH YEAH AND THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE, HE HELPED TO BROKER A PEACE BETWEEN ISREAL AND EYGPT.....WHICH IS STILL IN EFFECT....IF YA'LL DON'T LIKE THIS WAIT TILL MR. GORE RECIEVES AN OSCAR! I DARE SAY HE WILL OUT DO (IN A POSITIVE WAY) OL MR. BUSH JR. ANYDAY.
2007-02-01 14:16:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by txazreb 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
the minute Arafat (the creator of modern terrorism) was given the nobel prize it proved the awarders were lost in their own reality. anybody who will not acknowledge this is in that same world.
2007-02-01 13:37:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
For his work informing people about the ravages of global warming will have on the planet. He also won the prestigious Quill literary prize.
2007-02-01 13:26:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by rcj1rcj2 2
·
3⤊
3⤋