Positive? Negative? Neutral?
And please explain why!!! :-)
2007-02-01 12:42:43 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Generally positive. He is conservative, not a Republican. So when Republicans started spending mad money, wrecking the budget, he was the only "big" "conservative" talk show host who didn't try to gloss over the Republicans' failures.
He has flaws, like he doesn't let his callers talk sometimes, or cuts people off. He is a bit insecure, as he has to mention his pHD all the time.
2007-02-01 13:17:28 · answer #1 · answered by Arthur M 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's a militant extremist who is loud, pushy, and debates by shouting down his opponent and cutting their mike. I'm a conservative, I've read each and every one of his books cover to cover, I've listened to his radio show for years, and that's the truth about him. He's got the right to express his opinion but he is ethically derelict in what he does. He's nothing more than a loud, pushy, insulting hypocrite, and he is dividing this nation with his hateful rhetoric. I might even agree with him on some issues, but frankly he is part of the problem in this nation. He is divisive, antagonistic, juvenille, and unprofessional. The man doesn't know how to debate properly, because he's never had to debate someone outside of a radio or television program which he hosts. This means he's a coward. Why did I listen to him and read his books? Because I read everyone's books and I listen to all sides. I've read Ann Coulter, Michael Moore, Al Franken, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, Alan Colmes, several books by different senators and former politicians. By the way, all of the above names are examples of terribly partisan pundits and commentators who use fear, misinformation, and demagoguery to push their agenda and further divide this nation. Everyone on that list is a talentless hack in my opinion. I've listened to everyone in the media who's ever expressed a political thought. And I'm wiser and more culturally literate for it. That is why I listened to Michael Savage. Because of my knowledge of him, I could probably beat him in a debate. He wouldn't stand a chance. I could smell all his tricks and I know all of his blatant inconsistencies.
2016-05-24 03:43:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Overall positive. Hes sometimes arrogant, but often has a very knowledgable opinion of the people he talks about. Hes is a bit rude. I like him cause he does tell it like it is. Sometimes hes off a bit in my opinion (on certain topics) but not often.
2007-02-01 15:29:26 · answer #3 · answered by friendly advice from maine 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Micheal Savage is good at expressing what is on his mind and not "sugar coating" any issues. He does claim to be more independant than anything but his views seams to always lye on the conservative side so i think he is arather hypocritcal in that fashion because i think he speaks conservative.
2007-02-01 12:47:08 · answer #4 · answered by drseuss1217 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Savage is savage,egotistical and truthful and those who don't enjoy him "CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH".
2007-02-01 12:50:24 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋