English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

12 answers

No coz the Pies have that colour and Port need to add in their pretty Teal colour to it somewhere

2007-02-02 21:55:48 · answer #1 · answered by >--Trace---> 3 · 0 0

Unfortunately for Port Adelaide .. Collingwood already had the Nic- name of Magpies and wore the Black and white uniform. Given that Collingwood had been in what was the VFL since 1896 they had the right to maintain the uniform. Port is the *interloper* the newcomer and the tradition and history SHOULD be respected.

Had The VFL folded and the teams went off and joined the Sth Australian Football League .. THEN in my opinion .. Port would have had the right to maintain the Name MAGPIES and the black and white guernseys.. and Collingwood would have had to sacrifice theirs.

What COULD be a compromise is a Geelong/ Kangaroos kind of thing .. Allow Collingwood to keep the vertical stripes and Port could switch to horizontal stripes .. with perhaps a lightening bolt across the front to indicate it's Port Power.

Our game is a very unique and fantastic game .. and it has such a rich and colourful history. I have a soft spot for all the old VFL teams .. ( with the exception of Carlton , and I have a deep loathing for them). I am a Dees supporter .. but I will always ( lol which in itself may sound like a contradiction) defend and support Collingwood ABOVE interstate teams. Collingwood is a part of the history of the games evolution ..

Anyway may 2007 be a great footy season..

2007-02-02 19:39:47 · answer #2 · answered by ll_jenny_ll here AND I'M BAC 7 · 0 0

Unfortunately for Port Adelaide .. Collingwood already had the Nic- name of Magpies and wore the Black and white uniform. Given that Collingwood had been in what was the VFL since 1896 they had the right to maintain the uniform. Port is the *interloper* the newcomer and the tradition and history SHOULD be respected.

Had The VFL folded and the teams went off and joined the Sth Australian Football League .. THEN in my opinion .. Port would have had the right to maintain the Name MAGPIES and the black and white guernseys.. and Collingwood would have had to sacrifice theirs.

What COULD be a compromise is a Geelong/ Kangaroos kind of thing .. Allow Collingwood to keep the vertical stripes and Port could switch to horizontal stripes .. with perhaps a lightening bolt across the front to indicate it's Port Power.

Our game is a very unique and fantastic game .. and it has such a rich and colourful history. I have a soft spot for all the old VFL teams .. ( with the exception of Carlton , and I have a deep loathing for them). I am a Dees supporter .. but I will always ( lol which in itself may sound like a contradiction) defend and support Collingwood ABOVE interstate teams. Collingwood is a part of the history of the games evolution ..

Anyway may 2007 be a great footy season

2007-02-03 19:41:15 · answer #3 · answered by jezza b 2 · 0 1

Well said Deedubya! This question is one of absolute obscene blasphemy! The greatest, most successful team on the continent cannot - read, WILL not - give up its colours to some pissy team from a place that really is insignificant in the context of things. If they want to wear the black and white colours they can go back to the inferior SANFL and wear them to their heart's content, but it will not be tolerated in a league where the original "black and whites" are supposedly meant to surrender their guernseys which, mind you, have been with that club for their 115 years of existence. How long have Port Adelaide been around? Just over ten years? The Port Adelaide Power can kiss the proud, black and white, 115 year old arses of the Collingwood Magpies and keep their gruesome colours until they eventually deteriorate as a football club somewhere in the near future.

Good luck to all clubs this season and I hope it is a very tight contest.
GO PIES!!!

2007-02-03 12:04:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What a killer,Its funny that such a ridiculous question should be consided, but then again the authority that governs the competition, the AFL allows this absurd stupidity. Mcdonalds wont allow "anyone" with the same name sell hamburgers. So why the hell should the AFL allow a new club, cash in on their MAJOR asset Collingwood, and allow them to wear the same colours, if black & white are. Collingwood have put more bums, so to speak,on seats than any other AFL club and thats actual fact at actual games before you even consider the Magpies Radio and Television audiences. Then add the 50 something years Media promotion,of the VFL/AFL competition, between Lou Richards and Eddie McGuire, both Collingwood life members,and you have to ask what has pt-adelaide done to deserve wearing black and white anyway , and the answer is ?

2007-02-02 23:26:01 · answer #5 · answered by deedubya 5 · 1 0

It's bad enough when Geelong plays North with both of them in blue and white. There is no need to have two sets of magpies (one is more than enough).

Added later:

If we are to go with history, however, Port Adelaide formed in 1870 while Collingwood didn't appear for another 22 years. Port is the older club and should take precedence. If Port had been invited to join the AFL when the AFL was formed from the VFL then there would have been a real argument over who should wear black and white and be called the Magpies.

Collingwood got in first so Port has to give way but Collingwood supporters should be careful with their abuse of an older club.

2007-02-02 12:05:31 · answer #6 · answered by tentofield 7 · 1 0

No never.What next?That is like advocating heresy.That is
unthinkable.Is the world coming to an end?Is this what happens in civilized society?That sort of nonsense is covered by laws that go back centuries.Is nothing sacred these days?
I could be wrong but I think the rights of the Collingwood Football Club were even mentioned in the laws of ancient Rome.
There is imperial law still on the books that says anyone falsely claiming ownership of the black and white will finish up in the arena being fed to the Tigers.

2007-02-04 13:24:17 · answer #7 · answered by melbournewooferblue 4 · 1 0

classic wedding ceremony ettiquette strongly discourages wearing the two all-black or all-white clothing, as all-black is a demonstration of dying and mourning, on an identical time as all-white is the colour the bride would be wearing (considerable no-no to out-shine the bride!). Of the outfits you discribed, i've got confidence the single with white floral print may well be the main appropriate on the "classic" wedding ceremony, using fact it is likely a stable stability of the two colorations. even nonetheless, you probably did not say no count if the marriage became right into a huge formal wedding ceremony or a small casual wedding ceremony. At small weddings, maximum traditions like that are thrown out the window using fact the couple is extra in contact approximately your presence relatively than your cloth cabinet. or maybe at great formal weddings, a tasteful gown it is all black or generally black with white is seen ideal. as long as you do not positioned on all-white, you're able to be fantastic. have exciting, and stable success with the bouquet toss! :-D

2016-12-13 06:39:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Port Power are a seperate entity in the AFL, their colours are black white silver and teal. This is not because the AFL does not wish to have a team which wears black and white stripes, but because one existed prior to their admittance to the AFL

2007-02-01 13:52:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

No they should'nt,they joined the AFL from another league which already had a team with black and white stripes and if collingwood had of joined the S.A.N.F.L i would expect them to change their colours and for port to keep the b/w stripes,just good etiquette i think.

2007-02-01 21:21:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers