it rocks, i guess...
2007-02-01 11:43:41 · 11 answers · asked by k-sof. 3 in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Philadelphia
Yep!
2007-02-02 02:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by NikNak 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I have heard of it but never been there- but I can tell you that the Susquehanna subway station is one block north of the Temple University campus and it always used to smell like urine- does that answer the question regarding the town? LOL
2007-02-02 12:32:32 · answer #2 · answered by banana 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO: Is it in Susquehanna County? I was surprised to find that there was a Lancaster City in PA and Yes it is in Lancaster County.
2007-02-02 10:22:15 · answer #3 · answered by whatevit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I've heard of it. The river's filthy, but that's not the town, right?
What rocks about it?
2007-02-01 11:51:17 · answer #4 · answered by SnowFlats 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah, get a map of Pa and look it over; google it
2007-02-01 11:51:54 · answer #5 · answered by Patches6 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, I've heard of it. Isn't that named after a river or something.
2007-02-01 11:51:13 · answer #6 · answered by Smitha 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
at modern-day adult adult males will call some adult adult males good-looking in the event that they in fantastic condition societies definition of the suitable male physique.yet you ought to gain that adult adult males dont think of adult adult males are the greater advantageous looking than women individuals by skill of any stretch like women individuals think of girls individuals idealize attractiveness. women individuals in lots of situations say looking a member of a similar intercourse aesthetically friendly doesn’t cause them to gay, and that's actual. as a be counted of actuality, i've got self belief everyone who hates his/her intercourse adequate to evaluate his/her gender’s physique intrinsically gruesome has subject concerns. yet, the archetypical female doesn’t provide up there, she additionally says “women individuals are greater beautiful than adult adult males” and this time issues are very distinctive. while comparing adult adult males to women individuals, they're judging a image (“attractiveness”) interior a dichotomous format; it has no longer something to do with looking one’s intercourse aesthetically friendly or no longer (a case we already uncovered), this time that's a pair of “geared up in” (yet moderated by skill of society) bigotry which will render one intercourse’s actual traits greater beautiful than the different’s. this difficulty needless to say includes sexual orientation via fact the gadgets would be evaluated in accordance with sexual attributes; and because the two sexes are no longer equivalent, the end result won't be able to be something yet a Boolean (the two male traits render the male intercourse greater advantageous looking or female traits render women individuals greater advantageous looking, somebody who says they're the two ideal is mendacity for the reason that we start up from the muse of pondering the two sexes visually distinctive and somebody who says they're distinctive is only eluding the assessment together as pointing out the obtrusive). maximum women individuals are lesbian (they locate the female physique greater aesthetically friendly , they want to look at women individuals, etc.) leaning bisexuals (they seek for companies, see intercourse as a activity, etc) by skill of nature; i don't get why persons are so reluctant to settle for this actuality. I advise, this is infrequently a revelation.
2016-09-28 07:21:28 · answer #7 · answered by Erika 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yep, but never heard that it rocks...
2007-02-02 04:52:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have heard of it but I haven't been there!
2007-02-03 05:57:20 · answer #9 · answered by rb1111girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes, it is not that little
2007-02-02 05:43:55 · answer #10 · answered by Molly SH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋