I think that we should take the weapons we have and bomb them back to the Stone Age, and be done with it.
2007-02-01 10:59:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ex Head 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Congress is not going to give him anywhere near that amount. They will allow money for Afghanistan but very unlikely that Bush will get any more for Iraq
2007-02-01 11:01:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by bisquedog 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm sick of him sending good money after bad. Imagine burning stacks of hundred dollar bills every second. That's what he's doing with OUR money. Well, money WE are borrowing anyway.
We've got to stick with Afghanistan tho and unfortunetly Iraq too. at least for now.
2007-02-01 10:59:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by dapixelator 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
some human beings have replied that it is not a failure yet, as I keep in mind, the president took income of a dramatic image op along with his provider fly-in and speech in front of a "undertaking finished" banner. If the "undertaking" became into "finished" then, then why are we nonetheless there and caught with him insisting on committing extra funds and troops this some years later. Is that "achievement" or "failure?" i'm sorry to respond to this question with yet another question. frequently, that doubtful enormous distinction is reserved for politicians--which i'm not.
2016-12-13 06:36:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing
2007-02-01 10:57:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wondrer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
if this is true, then this is yet ANOTHER testament to his stupidity, ignorance, and stubbornness. too bad i'll have to pay for it.
2007-02-01 11:00:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by !{¤©¤}! 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
He is the commander in chief. He is in charge of war. If that is what he wants, then he should get it.
2007-02-01 10:58:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
1⤊
4⤋
who cares, it isnt my money, its my grandchildren who will be paying it off and I will be long dead when the bill comes due
2007-02-01 10:58:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋