The Stamp Act was passed by the British Parliament on March 22, 1765. The new tax was imposed on all American colonists and required them to pay a tax on every piece of printed paper they used. Ship's papers, legal documents, licenses, newspapers, other publications, and even playing cards were taxed. The money collected by the Stamp Act was to be used to help pay the costs of defending and protecting the American frontier near the Appalachian Mountains (10,000 troops were to be stationed on the American frontier for this purpose).
The actual cost of the Stamp Act was relatively small. What made the law so offensive to the colonists was not so much its immediate cost but the standard it seemed to set. In the past, taxes and duties on colonial trade had always been viewed as measures to regulate commerce, not to raise money. The Stamp Act, however, was viewed as a direct attempt by England to raise money in the colonies without the approval of the colonial legislatures. If this new tax were allowed to pass without resistance, the colonists reasoned, the door would be open for far more troublesome taxation in the future.
Few colonists believed that they could do anything more than grumble and buy the stamps until the Virginia House of Burgesses adopted Patrick Henry's Stamp Act Resolves. These resolves declared that Americans possessed the same rights as the English, especially the right to be taxed only by their own representatives; that Virginians should pay no taxes except those voted by the Virginia House of Burgesses; and that anyone supporting the right of Parliament to tax Virginians should be considered an enemy of the colony. The House of Burgesses defeated the most extreme of Henry's resolutions, but four of the resolutions were adopted. Virginia Governor Fauquier did not approve of the resolutions, and he dissolved the House of Burgesses in response to their passage.
********************************************************************
As part of an effort to defray the burgeoning expense of running the empire, Parliament passed the Stamp Act in March 1765. The law was to become effective in the colonies on November 1 and was announced by Prime Minister George Grenville many months in advance; he expressed a willingness to substitute another revenue-raising measure if a more palatable one could be found.
The act required the use of stamped paper* for legal documents, diplomas, almanacs, broadsides, newspapers and playing cards. The presence of the stamp on these items was to be proof that the tax had been paid. Funds accumulated from this tax were to be earmarked solely for the support of British soldiers protecting the American colonies. Violators of the law were to be tried in the vice admiralty courts, a detail that would not be overlooked by its critics.
The British authorities were not trying to oppress the colonists and regarded the stamp tax as entirely reasonable; even Benjamin Franklin, then a colonial agent in London, gave his grudging acquiescence to the plan.
Despite parliamentary intentions, colonial reaction was adverse and immediate. The Sugar Act of the previous year had been a tax on trade, in effect an indirect and external tax. But in the Stamp Tax the Americans for the first time were faced with a direct, internal tax. This distinction was argued effectively in the writings of John Dickinson, one of the early leaders of the opposition to British policies. However, these arguments seemed to be incomprehensible hair-splitting to Parliament and royal officials.
The effects of the Stamp Act were to unite some of the most powerful elements of colonial society — lawyers, clergymen, journalists and businessmen. Opposition came in a variety of forms. Some was reasoned and informal, such as James Otis’ The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved, a pamphlet that proclaimed the unconstitutionality of taxation by agencies in which the colonies were not represented.
A more formal response came in the meeting of the Stamp Act Congress in October 1765, an inter-colonial effort to orchestrate opposition to the British plan.
The greatest impact, however, came through the Stamp Act riots in which violence was used to intimidate potential tax agents and public demonstrations were employed to solidify radical opposition. Shopkeepers agreed among themselves not to sell British manufactures (nonimportation agreements) and strong-arm Sons of Liberty made certain that the merchants maintained their resolve.
The general unpopularity of the Grenville program led to the failure of his government in June 1765; the Marquis of Rockingham replaced him and began the process of finding a way out of the chaos. After much debate in Parliament, the Stamp Act was repealed on March 17, 1766 due in no small part to the protests of merchants at home who felt the pinch of the nonimportation programs. The Stamp Act was repealed out of expediency, not because American arguments about taxation had been accepted in England.
As a face-savings gesture, however, Parliament approved the Declaratory Act (March 1766), which stated in part that Parliament:
had, hath, and of right ought to have, full power and authority to make laws and statutes of sufficient force and validity to bind the colonies and people of America, subjects of the crown of Great Britain, in all cases whatsoever.
This statement of Parliamentary supremacy was wisely ignored by colonial opposition leaders, who were contented with their victory over the Stamp Act.
2007-02-01 11:00:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by sgt_cook 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The tax that is imposed on any sort of documents is STAMP TAX. It was originated in Spain and then gradually making its way in the European countries and in rest of the world in later part of the century. A legal document like government documents, property papers, people will and many others has to have a stamp on it, and they can vary from a cent to several dollars.
With time stamp collection have also become a hobby and stamps that are hundred years old are also sold for great prices at auctions.
2014-10-08 19:14:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've got a sheet about the Stamp Tax here, we're learning about the American Revolution right now. Here it is,
STAMP TAX - 1765
This law required a stamp on all government documents, newspapers and legal papers like birth certificates, farm purchases etc. These stamps cost from a penny to several dollars. This angered the colonists so much that they rioted in Massachusetts. The law was repealed in 1767.
2007-02-01 11:02:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Megzee 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
the only element i might particularly upload to what has been reported above is what are you searching for in a rifle? The .223 has a tendency to tumble swifter popping out of a shorter barrel. whilst an prolonged barrel tend to stabilize the projectile out to longer yards. So once you're searching for something for aim taking pictures you perhaps greater effectual off with a sixteen" barrel or longer. As for is it nicely worth it the hardship of a Tax Stamp, it particularly relies upon on I reckon. i individually relish my existence how that is not any longer having to be concerned approximately paper artwork on my firearms different than coverage motives.
2016-11-02 02:14:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋