English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Paid off officials

2007-02-01 10:32:57 · 14 answers · asked by macho-writer 2 in Sports Football (American)

14 answers

That depends on who wins this year.

2007-02-01 11:25:40 · answer #1 · answered by Scottie Boy 6 · 0 1

okay so the steelers weren't great but if you pull off 3 straight upsets against a higher seeded team than you i think you damn deserve to go to the Superbowl. True, Roethlisberger played **** in the Superbowl but the fact is the Steelers capitalized and that's what determines winners and losers. Plus paid off officials? remember Polamalu's pick that was called back against the Colts? you can't argue that the Steelers got all the calls and that happened, the Steelers nearly lost it all on that **** call.

2007-02-01 12:43:31 · answer #2 · answered by ? 2 · 1 1

No. I was rooting for the Seahawks in that game but you have to admit the Steelers made some great plays in that game. The touchdown pass from Randle El to Ward. The 73 yard run by Parker. Those are the kind of plays that win teams championships.

2007-02-01 11:15:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No, but they did have THE BEST POST-SEASON EVER. that's not my opinion, that's a FACT.
Only team to win 3 straight road games to get to the Superbowl.
Only team to knock out the No.1, No.2, and No.3 seeds, and also the other No.1 in the Superbowl.

honestly though, why are people still bitching about the refs A YEAR LATER, get over it!!!!!!

2007-02-01 10:40:56 · answer #4 · answered by johnnyDRAMA 5 · 3 2

If they were, then what does that make Seatlle and the other 31 teams that didn't win the Super Bowl in '05?

2007-02-01 10:39:07 · answer #5 · answered by bozsik 2 · 2 2

lets see......they went into the playoffs as a wild card, won every game on the road, went to the superbowl, and won that game, granted they didn't play their best, but they won. now lets add that to the fact that the rooneys are known for being cheep. I'm gonna say no, they weren't

when is everyone gonna move the f#$k on with their lives and get over it, **** happens, officials aren't paid off.

2007-02-01 10:44:56 · answer #6 · answered by kristen 4 · 1 2

I have to say something! I love the steelers so to answer your question I would have to say no.

2007-02-01 10:43:15 · answer #7 · answered by rb1111girl 2 · 2 1

i wouldnt say that but rothlesburger had the worst qb rating to ever win a superbowl with 30.6

2007-02-01 10:37:13 · answer #8 · answered by Leebert51 3 · 1 1

I agree - they definitely should not have won. It was pretty awful. Are they the worst? No, I think the Tampa Bay team that won was the worst.

2007-02-01 10:41:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

No,the2000 Ravens were.

2007-02-01 12:37:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers