"Autobiography of a Yogi"
What have you got to lose? $10?
2007-02-01 10:39:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mary Anne 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
The only thing I ever know for sure is what I'm experiencing right now. Beyond that, sure, maybe none of it's real, but what else have I got to believe in? Reality hasn't failed me yet (although I keep hoping it will), and I've come to trust in it. If this is the matrix, well, I've been taken in. ... So? That's what I am, then - a matrixial being, or whatev.
What does "real" mean, anyway? I don't need someone else to confirm my reality for me - what I experience is the realest thing there can possibly be. Other people's consciousness is a matter of faith, and a bit of daring logic.
Philosophy is uplifting, not depressing - to understand that life's what you make it, and to move beyond desire and insecurity, is what it's all about.
2007-02-01 10:37:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by zilmag 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
again.. some people have been watching too much Matrix! =P
its depressing to see some of the same questions or questions that are philosophical here.
anyway, your not a fabrication in my head.. because you would have to be in many other people's heads too. if you touched anyone or vice versa, you would feel different sensations. It is real because there is nothing else that I know as real..and you cant prove to me that it would be otherwise. No illusion or part of my imagination could be so details. Dreams are not real though. They are deeper things that we have experienced with our eyes or have thought about subconciously.
2007-02-01 11:40:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Sore wa himitsu desu! 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
i've got self belief precisely that comparable way you do. The is particularly a non secular vacancy in this worldwide, whilst quickly as I accompanied atheism in my existence, i assumed it would make me sense liberated, even though it particularly made me sense worse accepting that existence is basically an accident. all of us stay in a equipment pushed via financial objectives, classification divide, commercials, weapons, crime, mendacity politicians and conspiracies. the certainty that there is not any greater beneficial which ability to existence different than the phantasm of giving it one is an particularly depressing area of settle for for assorted human beings. looking decrease back on issues, while i develop into "delusional" with my former ideals I had something that gave me emotional potential and made me see existence in a such alluring way. All we do is develop into programmed and conditioned to the least high priced device, striving to flee financial slavery and flow approximately our techniques of looking the phantasm of happiness. that could be a confusing place.
2016-11-02 02:11:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Philosophy does just the opposite for me.
Understanding myself and my surroundings are some the greatest fulfillments of life. Even if it is that life is an illusion. It just shows that you should live the life you are given to the fullest. Be happy, show love, have fun. Live your life, even if it isn't real.
Philosophy is happiness for me. It is something i enjoy doing in my spare time. I love trying to comprehend the compound questions of our life. And no matter what conclusion i come to, i'm always happy that i came to one.
2007-02-01 12:04:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by sum_guy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Philosophy only depresses me when I read Nietzsche or Sartre. But there is a sense in which I like Sartre, even though I hate the produce of his worthless philosophy. We obviously have a real love/hate relationship.
2007-02-01 11:43:49
·
answer #6
·
answered by sokrates 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i think it is just fun, do to so many possible answers, which the philosophy is right or wrong depending on who you are, and what you believe, well if you think about the things you go through, what does it matter if it is real or not, there is no limit to the mind of us, and what is real is unreal and what is unreal is real, we are all here due to having a purpose and living is as real as it can be, and i dont think our head could just think about the life, if so then i think all of us in some time in our thinking are pretty cruel but if it is in the mind, wont we be able to do whatever we want, there is no limit in the mind, so therefore life has to be real
2007-02-04 15:04:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by jimar 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
It does not matter whether or not the reality you perceive actually has corporeal existence. You experience it as such and will always do so.
Whether or not your loved ones exist solely in your mind does not determine whether or not they are "real". What determines their reality to you is how your mind relates to them. You know them. You love them. They really do exist somewhere. What difference does it make where that is?
They are real.
Big Al Mintaka
2007-02-01 11:58:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by almintaka 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
--Well that indeed is one of the most depressing things I have heard of, can you imagine the hurt you put on to your family if you even suggest that to them--that is definitely a sad reality?
--Well, you can stop eating and see if you are in reality-- starting to die?
--Same thing with not drinking any liquid, see what happens after 3 or 4 days--then if you do not believe in the reality of dying of thirst, then your well on your way to non-reality or simply death.
2007-02-01 11:59:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by THA 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
whether or not your existence is real is irrelevant. You are experiencing it(I think therefore I am). Even if this is nothing more than an elaborate false existence it doesn't change the fact that it is an existence, even if if only in your head.
I find social philosophy much more depressing.
2007-02-01 11:52:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by ottomated420 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
That doesn't really sound worth living. Take a dose of hope and call me in the morning.
2007-02-01 16:21:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by ea_villeneuve 2
·
0⤊
0⤋