The Democrats might change the US policy on economy and war. It could be better if properly administered by Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
2007-02-01 10:32:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
2⤊
8⤋
You are either dreaming or smoking an illegal substance. Neither one will "end the war." Their idea of ending the war is to surrender to murderers. The economy of the Clintoon days was a sham. Clintoon inflated the numbers by 30%. It was never as good as the news reported it. The economy we have today is genuine and is the best it's ever been. So what if Hillarious and Oblahma were to be the first woman and black holders of the Presidency and Vice Presidency? Does that make them qualified to hold the orifices? Absolutely not! Neither one has much of a record. Clintoon has been in the Senate for six years and has not one law with her name on it. Oblahma is a two-year newbie and really has no business doing anything other than marking time and building a record. And how will they return world peace and hope in democracy? Peace is not the absence of war. Peace is the absence of the threat of war. We have enemies, none of which these two lightweights will confront. And democracy is nothing more than mob rule. Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding on what's for lunch. Liberty is an armed sheep contesting the result of the vote.
2007-02-01 10:39:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by christopher s 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Boy, the brilliance is overwhelming.(hill ee ary) Hillary for president and (Oh bo mah) Obama for vice (pres dee ent) President best for America.
Why am I even addressing this?
1- Hillary is asking George Bush to end the war before the end of his term.
2- The economy is better now than it's ever been.
3- We need a woman for President but surely not Hillary.
4- I'm sure Obama would make a very good President or Vice President but let's elect him for that reason not BECAUSE he's black, but in spite of that.
5- We will have world peace when people stop shooting at us and not a moment before. I still have hope for Democracy and you could too as soon as you get over your anger at our President
There has never been a perfect President and there never will be, but wouldn't it be great if we could accept that and respect the presidency in spite of who it was?
2007-02-01 11:07:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by H.C.Will 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It isn't best-not at all. They will take the soldiers out of Iraq, but that won't end the war. The only reason the economy was booming in the Clinton days is because the after-effects of the glorious Reagan years were still in effect. Clinton did NOTHING to improve the economy. If anything, his actions were detrimental, and now Bush is having to clean up after Clinton and it's making him look bad. In a good forty years, Bush will be remembered as a great president. Guaranteed.
2007-02-01 10:38:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by RidiculousTallness 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm not a Bush supporter at all, but you're wrong.
The Bush economy is actually better than the Clinton economy... I don't like big business-welfare either, but that's just what the numbers say.
Also, we're never getting "world peace". Not until aliens show up and we have someone to hate besides each other.
They would end the war, but the war is going to end under the next President anyway, Republican or Democrat, and that is a good thing.
Hillary is an incredibly divisive political figure. She will divide the country even further.
Obama is a uniter. But he couldn't cancel Hillary out.
So, I might vote for Obama, but never Hillary. Never.
2007-02-01 10:38:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Richardson '08 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
will end the war? Sorry, that won't happen. Will return economy to Clinton days? Sorry, wrong again. 1st woman and black man in top two presidential roles, that would be obvious but not a reason. Return world peace and hope ? Sorry, dream on.
2007-02-01 10:35:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by tim g 3
·
7⤊
1⤋
No, they will govern by polls. Major issues will be sidestepped and they will spend their times fighting anything constructive advanced by anyone by thier cohorts. Can anyone really believe they are running for anything but their own quest for power, recognition and their place in history.
We the genaral populace must stop being so gullible!
2007-02-01 10:40:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
i think of it is going to likely be Hillary and Warren, andI thank you. possibly you and hubby (or Ruth) can attend an Obama speaking adventure after he leaves workplace. you need to use your constitutional spectacular to tell him you're patently predisposed to dislike people like him who're tall and skinny!!! Then waddle abode for some bratwurst!!!
2016-12-16 18:57:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by howsare 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't understand what your trying to say except your not aware of the details. The only thing you've said is color, sex, and what someone else did. Give some details and you might have a debateable subject, otherwise it's mindless babling.
2007-02-01 10:36:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋
This is a question from the Bizzaro World. Cool.
Which is the most evil of the two?
Hillary, no doubt. She is a marxist.
Which is the biggest hypocrite?
Obama, no doubt. His words are the opposite of his votes!!!!!
2007-02-01 10:36:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
What? Hillary bombed the vice president ?
2007-02-01 10:31:55
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lynn G 4
·
6⤊
2⤋