2007-02-01 10:24:37 · 13 answers · asked by Huh? 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Ya gotta have a sense of humour. Alot of times those stupid questions are just for fun and not all that serious. I've had a few good laughs here from senseless questions that didn't necessarily require an answer, but when they are answered their just as funny as the question. Lighten up.
2007-02-01 10:31:51 · answer #1 · answered by zzap2001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I advise that the better shrink for contributions be finished away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless stay as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "supply away" application yet one that all of us make a contribution to love a value discounts plan, and could be secure against different makes use of by the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so frightened approximately it then why do not you; first placed it back into the indoors maximum sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their very own interest, 2nd pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet never paid a penny to it, and finally have it the same for each guy or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they desire something greater they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had never been incredibly replaced. They, a collection of scholars, stated that each physique quotes of interest may be 3% or much less for each guy or woman to alter into prosperous if needed (which could be authentic additionally to taces). the ultimate financial challenge may be, they suggested, while there have been no quotes of interest. Why not attempt this answer? the wealthy might nonetheless be prosperous. My question is: while soial risk-free practices will become a challenge linked to federal money owed, why not artwork with a balanced or benefit funds and spend no greater advantageous than is presented in, as any kin has to try for? Why not ban all loobying presents so as to get regulations that serve the rustic? God bless u.s..
2016-10-16 10:26:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You can pick and choose the questions of interest. If a question is dumb to you, move on to the next question. That is why this is here because some is not proud and realize they do not know everything and are willing to ask.
2007-02-01 10:36:06 · answer #3 · answered by Mrs. Morality 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask yourself. You also have the answer. So this was an exercise in futility on your part.
2007-02-01 10:28:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dee Dee Dee
2007-02-01 10:28:44 · answer #5 · answered by redneck_shoppers 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
you know what being dumb is>< you know what it is like to be isolated and keep from talking with people,
2007-02-01 10:28:07 · answer #6 · answered by chinpingmei 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Becuasd day id tupid. Duh-uh.
2007-02-01 10:28:22 · answer #7 · answered by marklemoore 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
becouse they feel like it, what a dumb question
2007-02-01 10:28:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that makes you one of them. why are you asking this question.
2007-02-01 10:29:45 · answer #9 · answered by Pebbles 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like yours?
2007-02-01 10:27:56 · answer #10 · answered by INDRAG? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋