How many years of driving in circles will it take before Bush comes up with a plan???
2007-02-01 09:32:24 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush and winning is an oxymoron.
2007-02-01 09:37:46 · answer #1 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
If Bush cared about the troops he'd have ensured they all had proper body armor before they arrived in Iraq. As it is, many of them had to have their parents buy them such gear on the open market. If Shrub cared, he'd have made sure they had adequate vehicles instead of that absolutely worthless piece of feces called a hum-vee that hadn't enough armor to stop a thrown stone, much less grenade fragments and bullets. If the jerkoff-in-chief cared, he'd have made sure the VA was adequately funded and prepared for the casualties among our troops instead of seeing them wait, sometimes for months, to see a doctor after initial treatment in the war zone. If Commandante Codpiece cared, he'd have seen to it that troops didn't arrive in Iraq during the inital combat and have to beg, borrow and steal ammunition from other units. If George Bush cared - but he does not care about the troops. He cares about George Bush. With him it's all about George Bush. That demented little freak, along with his equally demonic henchmen, has done more harm to this country than will be corrected in forty years. Hail to the azzwhole-in-Chief!
2007-02-01 09:45:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do you honestly believe that Bush is responsible for developing a war strategy??? You give him far too much credit! I'm not saying he is blameless, but he is relying upon information from military sources and getting advice from people in better positions to advice about strategy. If anyone is to be at blame for a poor strategy, it is the military heads who are advising.
Please don't misunderstand...I would LOVE to pin this on Bush. But I don't think I can in good conscience...this time...
2007-02-01 09:37:31 · answer #3 · answered by Super Ruper 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It will take 3 years. Unless it takes 4 years. However if it takes 4 years he reserves the right to change that to 5 or 6 years.
It is almost done anyone, insurgency it is last throws, at least it was until that damn Iran kept interfering.
Clearly this is in no way Bush's fault. Dont you see that?
2007-02-01 09:37:42 · answer #4 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they are issues that may in basic terms be found after tens of millions of trials. and of direction, strict limit desires to be in place. although, because of the fact the muse of technology is often changing with the aid of new discoveries, we'd desire to even have sympathy to the drug business enterprise besides. they do no longer seem to be miracle makers, they basically attempt to make earnings via advertising something that they "think of" might help different human beings. think of the worldwide with out antibiotics and different drugs, how many human beings might might desire to die? If we agree that technology can get replaced, the drug business enterprise would possibly no longer have an excuse of increasing drugs fees because of the fact of regulation fit.additionally if we glance on the different section that has used the socialist equipment it has slowed down and did no longer stay as much as its Utopian promise. No equipment is suitable yet open and unfastened industry is the final obtainable.
2016-11-02 02:04:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why don't you ask this question. If any Liberal or Democrat actually cared about the US Troops, wouldn't they be more supported about winning the war in Iraq.
When will Liberals pull their heads out of their asses?(Probably never, they like the smell)
2007-02-01 10:26:40 · answer #6 · answered by jimmideon49 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The problem is he "thinks" he has a winning strategy now.. If he cared about the troops instead of worrying about actually "winning" the war he would care more about their safety. He would make sure they have blankets etc that they need. instead we all hear about soldiers parents doing drives and taken donation to buy and send them blankets. instead he is sending more to shed blood on the iraq soil, and is talking about invading iran just as he did iraq. then problem with him is he wants to controll everyone everywhere..
2007-02-01 09:51:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
he still has a little over a year left of driving in circles
2007-02-01 09:36:57 · answer #8 · answered by TKM2001 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Is he supposed to tell you his plans? Do you really want him to?
If one plan fails then try another, but you can't know ahead of time which will work.
2007-02-01 09:52:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's just one big huge circle jerk.
2007-02-01 09:50:04 · answer #10 · answered by Dark Helmet 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋