English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am trying to be politically correct-first it was WMD's-then 400 billion on regime change-now we are at the War on Terror-sectarian etc. Bush is a true bungler...we should take care of our own people.

2007-02-01 09:06:52 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

10 answers

Bush should bother his own business!! He have kill more people than Saddam H. HE IS THE ONE CREATING WAR AFTER WAR!! Maybe he should go himself and fight for his own country, or send his twin dauthers to fight. Don't you think so?????????

2007-02-01 09:27:36 · answer #1 · answered by ILSE 5 · 1 1

Maybe a Giant Iran. But don't worry the Dems will be sending more troops, just watch. They just won't send as many as Bush asked for which was already caculated by the Bush Admin and both the Dems and Reps know this. This is how they save each others polical tails because they are really the same party going the the exact same direction. So don't kid yourself. The two parties pretend like they are playing each other but really they are both just playing us. Vote for a third party and end this madness!

2007-02-01 09:12:27 · answer #2 · answered by mikearion 4 · 0 2

Iraq, under Hussein, was a clear and present danger to the security of the United States, just as Iran is now. Iran will have to be dealt with strongly, just as Iraq had to be dealt with. The only bunglers in the situation are Pelosi and her cowardly ilk.

2007-02-01 09:15:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

confident yet Iranians are not as dumb as he thinks they're. in addition they are not going to roll over like Saddam's military did. The prevalent militia has an predicted 420,000 troops in 3 branches: floor Forces, 350,000 troops; army, 18,000 sailors; and Air rigidity, fifty two,000 airmen. in case you incorporate the imaginitive shield they have upward of 540,000- 4 time the U. S. forces in Iraq now. in assessment to Bush who seems hell bent on commencing yet yet another conflict, Iran in spite of the undeniable fact that their Grand Ayatollah, will muster the ire of all different countries against the U. S. in the UN to establish that difficulty. they're going to probable spotlight the rhetoric utilized by using Bush and his minions to assert that they are instigators and make this usa seem much greater silly. as nicely, Bush isn't helping our troops as that's appropriate now. he's sending them to Iraq with 40% of the kit they desire. He has additionally mentioned that as quickly as this finished Iraq ingredient is over, in the long-term each and every of the killing etc will only be a comma in historic past. (mentioned 9/20/06-CNN interview)

2016-11-23 21:11:52 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I dont think that anybody doubts that Bush is an idiot. As far as one big Iran goes, that is a battle that the middle east is going to have once we pull out of Iraq. We can think that we are going to stop it from happening, but it will happen, and it will be Bush's fault. Even if it is 2015, it will still be Bush's fault.

2007-02-01 09:13:27 · answer #5 · answered by Shmesh 3 · 0 2

I think the president feels that preventing the destruction of America is taking care of his people - you ppl seem so asleep at the switch - don't you realize that there are people out there who have publicly announced their intention to destroy Israel and the US and who are almost ready wtih nukes? It could happen this weekend - Here. In chicago or new york or Atlanta. Any day now. You ought to thank god that SOMEONE is taking some action!

2007-02-01 09:12:15 · answer #6 · answered by All hat 7 · 2 1

Bush sucks, but your question is sorta confusing.

2007-02-01 09:10:03 · answer #7 · answered by Randy Marsh 3 · 1 2

yes thanks to this idiot the balance of power in the middle east has decisively shifted in favor of the Iranians, how stupid can one president get.

2007-02-01 17:56:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Whatever you say.

damn conspiracy-theory nuts.

2007-02-01 09:10:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

not sure

2007-02-05 07:43:04 · answer #10 · answered by jerry 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers