Yes, you will actually be able to do more than a regular motherboard with a server motherboard. A server motherboard is made to take higher-clock rate processors, higher-performance memory, etc.
The main difference is the size of the board, where the holes are placed on the motherboard, and where the components are placed on the motherboard.
I wouldn't think form factor is much of an issue for expecting better performance for high-end graphic cards and fastest internet. It is mainly the design of the motherboard and the types of technology the video card and motherboard uses.
I would suggest if you want speed, do not go with any built in components. Purchase yourself a separate high-end video card and a separate high-end network card, although, the internet speed is mainly determined by the type of internet connection you have (DSL, Cable, or Fiber).
Fiber is the fastest of course, then Cable, then DSL or DSL then Cable, depending on the type of plan that you have for DSL or Cable.
2007-02-01 09:04:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Alvin E 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are some significant differences that you will run across, primarily drivers.
Micro ATX is the smallest usually used for very small footprint PC's
ATX - is the current "normal" sized mainboard it is the most common.
Extended ATX - I don't know about it.
For Speed you need money.
Literally, how fast you want to depends on how much you can afford.
Processor speed, in GHz, RAM size and speed and Video speed all cost more the faster you go. Don't go for the SLI or cross fire setups yet as most games don't use them.
2007-02-01 09:05:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Archer Christifori 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Form Factor has nothing to do with the speed or power of the motherboard. It simply specifies the physical size / layout of the board, and what size case / power supply you will need. You need to pay more attention to brand names and chipsets.
For brand names, Asus is the best, hands down. Stay away from PCCHIPS and ECS.
2007-02-01 09:06:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by ohjeezcomeon 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Xubuntu, from the makers of Ubuntu Linux, is quite designed for use on older desktops with constrained hardware. the only caveat is the computer's BIOS firmware might desire to be greater effective moderen than 1999-2000. feels like XP. It does run as a "stay CD", so which you will have the flexibility to objective all your hardware till now you attempt to place in it on your complicated stress. Get it right here: FreeSpire Linux (feels like Vista) is likewise worth a seem: FYI: I had FreeSpire engaged on a DELL Pentium III with 512MB of RAM, and an nVidia MX400 (and downloaded driving rigidity), so 256 MB RAM is probable no longer sufficient. the two are stunning opportunities for "abode homestead windows Switchers".
2016-11-23 21:10:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its components are usually high-end is the basic difference. The form factors describe size and on-board component arrangement, which governs the type of chassis it will install into.
2007-02-01 09:14:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. server boards are not necessarily faster. they are built for higher reliability and stability. they use SLOWER ram - ecc memory made to ensure no errors but generally slower. you will generally not find sli capable graphics, on board audio will suck. may not have a bunch of consumer pci or pci-x slots. i don't know what the standards are but if you want a home/gaming system, stick to the stuff made for it.
2007-02-01 09:24:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by hotrabbitsoup 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, the only difference is that they are built better and have higher tolerances plus additional cpu .
2007-02-01 08:58:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋