Which threat is more real and dangerous: global warming or Iran going nuclear?

Question

DON'T ASK AL GORE.

Answer 1

I think the question should be "which threat is more eminent". Iran will use nuclear weapons as soon as they are able - I guarantee it and since they are very nearly there I would say the threat of Iran using nuclear weapons is more eminent than the threat of Global warming which could take thousands of years.

Answer 2

I think Iran going nuclear would be more dangerous because global warming is a slow threat but if Iran goes nuclear then they could kill masses amounts of people at a time.

Answer 3

Iran is the real threat. Global warming is primarily a result of a cycle of the sun and the tilt of the Earth's axis.

Iran is controlled by someone who believes in the apocalypse and that it is imminent and that his responsibility is to make it happen. When he gets deliverable nuclear weapons he will attack Israel. Israel will have no choice but to eliminate Iran and any other mideast countries threatening them. It is likely that such actions will kick off a nuclear exchange between Pakistan and India.

Iran is the real danger and millions of people will die because of a religious extremest..

Answer 4

I think that Global Warming is worse on a large scale and Iran is worse on the lower scale. the nukes can kill a small portion of the worlds population but global warming can throw off the whole world by destroying ecosystems due to climate change. there is so much that global warming can do to us and also we may be able to slow down GW but it cant be prevented. We can slow down and stop Iran all we need to do is take their bombs. GW would have to be the most dangerous. if the ozone layer isnt there anymore then we will have skin cancer just by stepping into the sun or we will burn up and die. if a nuke is on its way we can evacuate people and also contain the situation. there are fall out shelters to hide in. if they shoot a nuke in cuba the only ones affected will be the ones around it but france probably wont be affected by it. if the polar ice caps melt everyone will notice it. just as the answer before me said that they no longer had a snowy winter. it may be a slow process but its affecting us right now as we speak. the nukes arent doing anything to us right now.

Answer 5

Oh man... Global warming is much more dangerous than you imagine. I doubt humans will die because of this, but almost all othes species will have to suffer. And it's not like it will happen in 100.000 years, it's happening now. Here in Bucharest for example this year we haven't had snow at all. I remember years when in the Winter holliday we used to dig snow tunnels in -20 C Now it only got to about -1 C. It's hard to imagine how this happened since a 2 C variation can destroy an entire echosystem if it persists over time.
P.S. I really have to reinforce the fact that 50 years is enough to destroy the entire Amasonian forest (deforestation included) if it continues at this rate. After that it will not be possible to come back. It has happened in teh past and it will again (Sahara was not always like that you know: crocodiles are still living in oases that are dissapearing by the day)

Answer 6

Global warming is a natural, solar event.

Iran is THE threat, along with anywhere else that harbors radical Islam.

Answer 7

do no longer evaluate some element you study and in basic terms one/2 of what you notice. Of direction, worldwide warming is genuine. The final Ice age has long previous away, has it no longer? So, we'd desire to have worldwide warming. Do people make a contribution to worldwide warming? on the full some small quantity, after all we are heat and we breath in oxygen and breath out CO2, we'd desire to be a factor of the main considerable difficulty. what's Al Gore going to do approximately it? Kill an entire lot of fellows and females human beings? continuously that's what Socialists do while they take manage of a rustic. Is that greater than destroying their economy and inflicting hundreds to starve to death?

Answer 8

The question isn't what's more dangerous but what do we have more control of. I would say we have more control of the Iran situation.

P.S. I'm ending all my answers with I'm sorry if my answer insulted you. Don't violate me. I know you'll violate me if you think "Global Warming, the sky is falling." Sorry for my sarcastic comment green peace people.

Answer 9

Global warming. Iran can be contained. nobody realizes that it's too late to put the brakes on for GW, because the car has already gone off the cliff.

Answer 10

Iran is definitely the more immediate threat.