Should the US drill in Alaska for oil? OR Reduce oil consumption?

Answer 1

how about ending the prohibition on hemp so we can grow the only high cellulose crop that actually could eliminate our dependency on foreign oil without handicapping us with limited supplies.

Answer 2

Drilling in Alaska for oil would be a very expensive solution to our energy needs. Not only would we have to pay to send people up there, but we would also need to repair and upgrade the pipeline as well as ship the oil here from Alaska. I believe that it is best to focus mainly on reducing oil consumption at this point in time but keep the idea of drilling in Alaska on the back shelf in case we need to later.

Answer 3

Drill in Alaska, being that the dreaded Oil Pipeline in Alaska no devastating effects, while cutting back on consumption at the same time.

Answer 4

The US should not drill in Alaska. The effects would be DEVESTATING for wildlife, for the environment, and for tribal peoples. If we keep treating the environment in such a poor way we will see the consequences sooner than later. It would be easy to reduce oil consumption, look at all the new types of cars being made and there are more that they haven't released to the public yet.

Answer 5

Do both. Drilling will provide high paying jobs and cut dollars going to those that hate us, reducing consumption will also dry up the finances of our enemies

Answer 6

Hell NO! it might only be yet another great government givaway on the fee of the yankee people. while will people pay interest and spot what is going on? Our president belongs to an Oil family contributors, the congress gets the biggest share of their funds from oil. awaken people!! The Oil foyer is the richest, terrific funded foyer in the international. They administration the money, so as that they administration the potential. Why might increasing oil reserves do something? Why do you think of they communicate approximately increasing oil reserves or tax refunds to help people. Why do you think of they forget approximately correct to the obtrusive, option fuels learn? option FUELS is the only thank you to renounce them and get administration of our united states lower back.

Answer 7

The oil in Alaska is entirely under a large are of gravel tundra far in the arctic circle. People claiming devastating effects on wildlife are either confused or lying.

Answer 8

How about doing both! As far as the prestine Alaskan landscape being cluttered with ugly ole oil wells, Many Americans have no plans of ever seeing the Alaskan landscape, so it will be of little bother to them.

What is most important to the US is to rid itself of dependence on middle east and Venezuelan oil. It will take a number of disciplines to accomplish this, the two you mentioned would be a great way to start!

Answer 9

I think we need to use up all the oil underground in Alaska. Alaska has volcanos, and if a new volcano erupts in an oil field, it will be a disaster of catastrophic proprotions.

Answer 10

off shore drill and cut oil consumption. we need to leave alaska alone...

Answer 11

Fossil fuels have always been a bad source. There is a largely ignored alternative that lasts twenty years, produces no waste, runs and runs, requiring engines with considerably less parts. No, not hybrids. Why this isn't effectuated is beyond my comprehension.