2007-02-01 06:35:35 · 13 answers · asked by doc_of_three 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
How do you pick just one?
I vote for Rush. I think where he leads, others follow. Without him maybe the lock-step righties might not be able to run as smoothly.
2007-02-01 08:11:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
None of the above . They are only hated by those who feel threatened by them . Hillary Clinton is so furious because they get the word out - on all her corruption & dirty tricks - that she's been pushing for laws to limit what information is available to the public . I'll take Rush Limbaugh ; Sean Hannity or Ann Coulter over Communism and Socialism any day of the week .
Many of those who make-up ridiculous so-called questions about them on "answers" ( that are nothing more than insults geared to pep up their pathetic ego ) don't have a clue - they feel like "something" just using their name in a sentence I guess . If they had a clue-they wouldn't show ignorance with an insult disguised as a question .
2007-02-01 08:48:27 · answer #2 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
At one point or another, both Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity were able to concede that liberals have gotten things right before. Ann Coulter never has. Not once.
2007-02-01 13:41:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I love them all because they are the few bright minds in the primarily liberal media. Ann Coulter's voice can get annoying so I try to avoid listening to her and just read her books. I like Sean the most but it's close between him and Rush.
2007-02-04 12:02:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Ann Coulter is definitely the worst.
2007-02-03 03:44:57 · answer #5 · answered by Dana Katherine 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Oh, Ann Coulter! I can't stand her voice. It's so annoying. I have to turn the channel whenever she is on Hannity or some other talk show. I wouldn't mind watching the debate, but her voice.....argghh
2007-02-01 06:48:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
The liberal biased enabling media is the problem.
They refuse to cover negative news about liberal bedwetting moonbats and refuse to cover positive news about conservatives.
Liberals are unable to win in the market place of ideas. Liberals can't win or be successful without having to cheat.
Liberals want to shut down free speech that the internet and talk radio provide.
Liberals are the new fascists.
Liberals suffer from Bush Derangement Syndrome.
Its real and it's incurable.
When stricken with this incurable disease, liberals minds warp into anti-American terrorist supporting mean spirited bigoted hunks of quivering flesh with an appetite to appear in front of a camera somewhere.
Liberals would gladly sacrifice millions of lives abroad and here at home in they derranged attempt to discredit President Bush.
2007-02-01 08:58:04 · answer #7 · answered by Feelsgood 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Rush would be the worst because hes a pompus *** on liberal media to try to get his view while completely flip flopping his opinion in the heat of the battle, i mean god forbid hes a good guy, but my lord don't give him a mic. Hmm... Flip Flopping, where have I seen flip flopping before.. hmmm my oh my... i would put Bush up there as well, started alright but ended with a nail in his foot.
2007-02-01 06:44:18 · answer #8 · answered by Unrec 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Sean Hannity for always cutting people off!
2007-02-01 08:10:42 · answer #9 · answered by Jim F 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
1. For a diehard liberal, this question is a no-brainer, all of them.
2. For a thinking liberal (an oxymoron) probably Ann Coulter.
2007-02-01 07:01:23 · answer #10 · answered by mqgarcia39 2 · 0⤊ 4⤋