2007-02-01 06:33:11 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
OK FIRST OFF NO NEED FOR NAME CALLING GROW UP! secondly
the reason our economy is doing "so well" as they put it is becuase we borrowed billions off of china and other country's
borrowing money from china thats dangerous in my meger opinon, and im sorry but you really can't even compare a ******** with a unjust war that has killed thousands and yes i remember 9-11 we all do, but more people have now been killed over there than where in the attack and we are capable of thinking deeply thats really an unfair point of view linsten to all of these people pissed for being lumped in with him
imgaine if would have said whats the differance between a republican and a special needs student, we are capable of deep thinking actully i would wager that most of the great philosphers of the last 200 yrs were probably libs but thats nbot the point of this question
I'M LOOKING FOR SOME SOILD FACTS WHERE HE WASNT SUPPORTED BY HIS OWN AND MAYBE SOME POINTS ON HOW HE ACTED ALONE
thank you people!
2007-02-01 07:06:50 · update #1
How can you not equate Clinton's philandering with the Democratic Party?
Perhaps parties are more than the actions of one person.
2007-02-01 06:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by C B 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, because we don't agree with him on everything.
We disagree with his support of illegal immigrants, while the Democrats WANT more illegals.
We disagree with a politically correct war that gets our soldiers killed, but we do agree with a war run by generals who know you need to kill the enemy.
We agree with his tax cuts because they have made the economy roar. Our GDP is at 3.4 percent and the Dow is at an all time high. The Dems disagree and want more government over anything, and they want US to pay for it.
We agree that if you come to this country there should be a patriot act to keep you from killing Americans if you are an Islamofascist. The Dems want status quo, and MAYBE they will respond once we are attacked. (Isn't this want they criticized Bush for?)
The problem is that the average Democrat doesn't think very deeply, they simply vote for the candidate with "Dem" next to the name, regardless of effect.
2007-02-01 14:44:25 · answer #2 · answered by Eric K 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is impossible not to equate the rubber stamp republicans with blunder but.
The more republicans take a stand against his imperialistic agenda the more you can separate Bush as an individual nut job.
2007-02-01 14:40:39 · answer #3 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Same way that most people don't equate Clinton's philandering/cheating/lying/sex addiction with the democrat party.
ONE person's actions do not define an entire political party.
2007-02-01 14:42:22 · answer #4 · answered by ItsJustMe 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Bush is inacting a personal aggenda that has nothing to do with the Republicans. His actions are bordering on being dangerous. I think he's capable of attempting a coup.
2007-02-01 14:40:57 · answer #5 · answered by Handy man 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bill Clinton failed to capture Osama Bin Laden and now we are all paying the price. Halliburton is getting richer.
2007-02-01 14:40:42 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How can you equate an entire political party with one of its members? Or is it convenient for you to blame everything on him, and therefore on his party?
2007-02-01 14:37:29 · answer #7 · answered by Pfo 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
he's all for illegals, spends money like a drunken sailor,
has imposed rules of engagement on our troops that put them in harms way
he looks like a liberal to me
2007-02-01 14:37:46 · answer #8 · answered by ken y 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because only the liberals seem to be stuck on the notion that he's a blunderer.
.
2007-02-01 14:35:45 · answer #9 · answered by FozzieBear 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Who really gives a rat's ***!!!
2007-02-01 14:41:30 · answer #10 · answered by Kogetsu 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋