Phillies40:
" Al Quida will never attack Democrats and Liberals because now they are on the same side."
Hogwash.
Why cant conservatives admit our foreign policy is Iraq is a failure? Is it THAT hard for them to take responsibility for their outdated,backwards notions that extreme nationalism doesnt always work?
2007-02-01 05:03:45 · 17 answers · asked by Cut The Crap 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If Democrats and Liberals were on the same side as AlQaida,wouldnt they want MORE of Bush's terrorist inflaming policies?
2007-02-01 05:04:43 · update #1
Iraq was a war of choice, not necessity.
~Senator Barbara Boxer
Our enemies are innovative and resourceful...They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.
~George W. Bush
...History shows that ... (people) can be deflected from their natural tendencies by artful propaganda, bogus crises, or other political trickery.
~Robert Higgs
Why should we hear about body bags, and deaths...I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?
~Barbara Bush
Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the president to explain to us what the exit strategy is.
~George W. Bush
So what is it?
2007-02-01 05:32:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Any matter of current foreign policy resides on the doorstep of the Republicans, because they were in power for the last 6 years. The problem with your statement is this. There are current fiascoes related to foreign policy which reside solely at the Democrats doorstep. The most notable is the Korean nuclear situation which was accelerated by the Clinton administration. I do not see any Liberals saying " wow what a mistake that was". Instead they also lay this on the Bush administration and say he hasn't dealt with it properly. The fact is that neither side takes responsibility for the failings of their own and where foreign policy is concerned this is not a Democrat or Republican problem, but rather an American one because it effects us all. We need to stop trying to place blame all the time and look for solutions which benefit us all.
2007-02-01 05:19:56 · answer #2 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First off quick message to "Feelsgood" please seek counseling. It's apparant from your post that have deep emotional problems and really could use about 10 years of therapy. This anger you feel towards people different than yourself and limited perspective on the world around you holds back the progress of our race. Please limit your wild-*** hate rhetoric statements to once a week for a while and notice how people don't treat you like a crazy person anymore. Seriously you will probably enjoy the change.
Moving right along to the question at hand.
You know how european authors accuse Americans of being arrogant? This is an example of why. The assume that Ali so-and-so from some remote village in Afganistan knows who the hell john kerry or nancy pelosi is - is absolutely hilarious!
They don't give a crap about our elections!!!
I'm sure Al qaeda is really pulling for hillary!!!!
All they know is they were told that George Bush dropped 2 thousand tons of explosives on their supposed sovereign country and that george bush imposed roadblocks and mandatory curfews - abu garaib - kidnappings etc.
They are just pissed about that stuff because they are only looking at it from a single perspective.
Because of that very simple obvious state of affairs - the bush publicity campaign has managed to warp and meld the two dissenting voices into somehow the same - at least when preaching to their own congregation that is.
To think any average citizen over there understands our electoral process or follows our candidates is absolute hogwash!!!
Dear Liberals - John Kerry had no intention of pulling out of Iraq either. He had no plan - he just bashed on bush but not even citing specifically what was wrong with the bush plan. He was a fall guy and never really intended to win imo.
Dear Conservatives - Bush has plunged this country into debt, regressed our civil rights, regressed corporate oversight and exponentially increased corporate welfare. All the while being the man in charge during the greatest loss of life for the last 30 years.
All politicians reflexively blame their opponents for everything.
Look at the dumbass politicians in Boston trying to blame the marketing guys for setting up light brights with cartoon characters on them. It's not just conservatives that want give the impression of being practically perfect in every way.
2007-02-01 05:21:36 · answer #3 · answered by Nicholas J 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Liberals are self loathing creatures.
That explains a lot of what they do that makes no sense.
Liberals are the new fascist Nazi's.
They can't tolerate any opinion different than their's.
Look what they do to college speakers. They throw urine, pies, pull fire alarms, start fights, etc etc, to keep conservative's from speaking.
They want to pass laws to eliminate talk radio.
Liberals are intolerant, bigoted fascists, incapable of allowing free speech.
Islamicfascists have pledged to murder you and me.
Liberals want to help them.
Conservatives want to fight them.
Liberalism is ok when it is practiced.
But todays America's liberals, are not real liberals.
They are against change of all types and devoid of new idea's or solutions to problems.
Conservatives offered many new programs and initiatives the last 6 years, and liberals always fought against them, with never an original idea or solution to offer in return.
Liberals love it whan a woman murders a child that is unborn but hate it when criminals who rape, murder and commit attrocities get the death penality.
In reality the liberals of today are Stalinists and Marxists. Their belief that government is the solution to all problems and no wealth should be privately owned is what drives todays liberals.
They are also anti-American. They believe America is the worlds problem and the world would be better off without America in it.
Liberals are all for forsaking the poor weak and downtrodden if America's military is involved in keeping them alive, but insist on keeping America's poor weak and downtrodden in their miserable existance because of 'political correctness', (New Orleans and any urban city).
2007-02-01 05:20:34 · answer #4 · answered by Feelsgood 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would like a different route taken there also. One thats more firm and decisive. that gets it done.
Here is what I dont like. It seems all to common to me that lib/dems ( as you put it ) forget that many of them voted for this action and now want to pretend they didn't ala Kerry and Hillary.
And further more... criticism by the citizen without an alternative well ok, criticism by the dems who are politicians but still have no definitive alternative plan. Well thats bs. If you voted for someone elses idea and now you don't like it then come up with something else. And I dont mean a generality like withdraw I mean a specific detailed plan.
2007-02-01 05:11:10 · answer #5 · answered by sociald 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because Al Quida did want the DEMOCRATS to win the 2006 election!!!
Al Quida wants America out of Iraq and so do the Democrats.
Al Quida tries so hard to cut the aids to our Troops in Iraq and Democrats already want to cut the funding for our troops.
Al Quida hates Bush and so do the Democrats.
Al Quida want to defeat America and Democrats see to they will be successful.
Prove me wrong, Sir.
P.S. I dont blame Liberals for the mistakes President Bush made. Who says War is easy? if everything works as planned, there will be no wars, no one would die. right?
2007-02-01 05:07:18 · answer #6 · answered by Quickie 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
final night, Obama whined that the Republican occasion antagonistic each little thing he did. "Opposing each little thing isn't a thank you to steer!" properly, you're making a sturdy factor. Obama had no foundation to whine. We merely oppose what we disagree with. we don't oppose him only to make political factors. If he might renowned our help of his distant places coverage, slow, ponderous and timid because it incredibly is, he could understand this reality. in reaction on your question in spite of the undeniable fact that, it fairly is through fact, for the main section, we accept as true with it. do not decide to be the 'international police'? high-quality. we are going to pull back and enable international locations rebuild their very own armies. enable's enable Germany, Japan and the different usa commit their components to construct up their defense force capability so they're able to safeguard themselves. Or, we can be the international police, enable those international locations to have constrained armies and safeguard a relative peace. (not undemanding to start a conflict in case you have not something to combat with.) See? I have faith u.s.. i don't have faith different international locations. And we aren't often 'preemptive'. as quickly as we are, it fairly is through fact 1000's or tens of 1000's of yank lives may be at stake. call me loopy, yet i might decide to behave in the past that occurs.
2016-10-16 10:08:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The fact that Al Queda supports the election of Democrats shows that your assertion that the current policies create more terrorists is false. Why would terrorists support a candidate that is harmful to their cause? Why won't you admit that it just isn't logical?
2007-02-01 05:10:15 · answer #8 · answered by VoodooPunk 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why is Iraq a failure? Winning a war is a failure to you? You don't make any sense. Please explain why Iraq is a failure, using your own mind, and words, instead of using the liberal media's. Thank You.
2007-02-01 05:12:56 · answer #9 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It is a time honored tradition in American Politics to blame the other side for your sides mistakes. We libs have done it too.
2007-02-01 05:13:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋