Good taste in art is always subjective. What is good taste in art for me may not be for you and what is good taste in art for you may not be for me.
2007-02-01 05:35:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by harveymac1336 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Try reading the 18th C philosopher David Hume's book On Taste. There was a whole debate back then about which organ of the body was responsible for good or bad taste
2007-02-02 06:06:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Duffer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with Harvymack 1336's statement. That being said, I would bring history and culture to the mix. In the Terminal Classic Period, artisans in the Mayan culture created numerous monolithic phallic sculptures. In Washington DC, statues that were commissioned in the 20th century have been covered due to morality concerns and considered by some to be in bad taste. Your perception of taste depends on what you bring to the work. It will always be subjective so you will have to make that determination for your self. What you decide will be your answer!
2007-02-01 10:13:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by grstroup2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good taste, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder.
2007-02-01 04:40:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Melius 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Good taste is sometimes hard to find. But once you find it, wow. For example a painting that comes out to you, a photograph, that speaks volumes, a sculptor that is breath taking, etc.
2007-02-01 07:04:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kyle R 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good taste is the contrary of bad taste. For example, "Painter's ****" is VERY bad taste !
2007-02-01 23:03:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by jacquesh2001 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the definition bears no relationship to art- art is art
2007-02-02 20:39:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
anything that is arty farty and crappy more than likely... anything young people won't like... more or less anything that snobby people like!
it is balls.
2007-02-01 04:43:42
·
answer #8
·
answered by Aled H 3
·
0⤊
2⤋