arms that couldn't bend then i'd do less work and couldn't resist advances from my hubby
2007-02-01 04:52:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
One leg longer. You could always get a special shoe for the short leg's foot. If your arms couldn't bend how would you feed, clothe, bath yourself? Definitely the leg thing.
2007-02-01 03:21:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bean62960 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Where did you come up with this question lol. I do have one leg longer then the other. I have to wear lifts in one shoe. It hurts my back if I dont wear them, so I guess I dont have to have arms that dont bend :)
2007-02-01 03:29:12
·
answer #3
·
answered by Me 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would prefer an arm that couldnt bend because with one leg longer than the other you would have a limp and noone wants a limmy loo
2007-02-01 03:19:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
One leg longer than the other, cos I could always buy a higher heel shoe for the short leg!
2007-02-01 03:19:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Keira H 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
one leg longer than the other
2007-02-01 03:23:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The longer leg, every time. You'd have to have someone feed you as you wouldn't be able to reach your mouth. Bottom wiping wouldn't be too easy either.
2007-02-01 03:22:16
·
answer #7
·
answered by G and T 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
one leg longer for sure - you could just wear like a stilt type thign on the short leg and all would be cushtie!!
2007-02-01 03:21:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by board-stupid 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
eeks...sad situation...guess I would have to choose the longer leg....at least I could walk...maybe with a big limp? But...guess I wouldn't care...At least I could still hold my kids...
2007-02-01 05:42:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥Minnie Mouse♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd cut the leg off if i could just encourage you to the bedroom ;)
2007-02-01 03:26:29
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋