Liberal hypocrisy is more like I support the troops but go to the anti-war protests. You can't have you cake & eat it to. Think back to the Vietnam War remember how our troops felt being bashed -called baby killers? That's what you are doing to our current troops you are demeaning their scarfices!
2007-02-01 03:24:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
6⤋
I am amazed that the libs can scream about Bush being a liar and criminal--when there is NO tangible evidence to support their claims. Seems the democrats are willing to ignore perjury, to wink at obstruction of justice, to tolerate the nation's chief law-enforcement officer actively working to subvert our legal system--but only if he is a democrat using the constitution for his own personal gain. They screamed about Bushes post 9/11 wiretapping but were not nearly as upset over a much broader surveillance program under the Clinton administration, which routinely monitored millions of phone calls between U.S. citizens without a court ordered warrant. In fact, the NYT called the blanket invasion of privacy a “necessity”, even though it was carried out without the justification provided by the 9/11 attacks.
2007-02-01 04:15:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cherie 6
·
3⤊
2⤋
Halliburton via Dick Cheney and Dubya empty our Treasury for their personal gain.
John Edwards builds a basketball court.
You're trying to make some kind of witty argument?
2007-02-01 03:27:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by LatexSolarBeef 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
The biggest is George Soros! He's basically trying to fund all liberals into congress and the White House to push his agenda to legalize drugs. Next is Teddy Kennedy who doesn't want a windmill farm built on the Cape eventhough it would benefit the power needs there, and it's so not to spoil his view from his property. John Kerry's claims of war crimes in Vietnam when he himself shot a retreating 14-year old VC in the back.
2007-02-01 03:23:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Cover up question for conservative "hypocracy" as you put it.
Typical.
And dont talk about the rich,thats phony coming someone like you.Phony.
How many could we feed with the money spent on Iraq?
2007-02-01 03:18:35
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cut The Crap 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
YOUR QUESTION HAS NO MERIT.
you dont even know what a liberal is.
republican liberal , democratic liberals
or are you just a conservative.
why dont you try and ask a question , rather then voiced your conservative views by degrading other people action or non actions.
Yo seem to be the biggest hypocrite.
2007-02-01 05:25:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by jupiter 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
"Bemoaning the two Americas" - what are you talking about? North America and South America?
As for how he chooses to spend his money - why is that any concern of yours? Don't conservatives think that people have the right to spend their money as they see fit?
Besides... please provide me a reliable source outlining how much money Edwards donates to charity every year.
Yeah, I didn't think you could.
2007-02-01 03:19:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
probably lots, why should John Edwards have to feed people besides his family, are you hungry? there is a soup kitchen where you live if you are
how about you president aquandering Billions of US Taxpayers $$$$$$$ for his illegal war?
2007-02-01 08:29:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I would have to go with the liberal idea of universal health care...do you really think for one minute that Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, or Bahama Obama Yomama is going to go see the same doctors they would stick YOU with if universal health care goes into effect? Think again...they will tell you who you can go see, how much you can spend, what procedures you can have, what medicines you can and can't have, and they will continue treating themselves to the best at the expense of the middle class...
2007-02-01 03:25:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by makrothumeo2 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
What has one thing got to do with the other?
2007-02-01 03:18:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋