2007-02-01 03:10:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
No. It's a form of brain washing, but not propaganda...Well, it can be though...
2007-02-01 03:13:53 · answer #1 · answered by Michael R 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ok, so this pollchange into held in one smallish section (i don't be conscious of how many human beings examine this paper) despite if it substitute right into a pollof fairly everybody residing in that section and everybody in that section substitute into entitled to take part in the poll. it incredibly is precisely what they do in elections. Take a pattern poll, which substances a sturdy indication of ways the rustic will vote. Or can we even have faith that in the time of basic terms the human beings of Shields for some reason think of the McCanns have been neglectful and that something of the rustic would not? Judging by the comments in YA, critiques of acquaintances and kin, letters and comments in newspapers (in the past they have been censored), i'm stunned that the form of folk who think of the McCanns could be charged with forget is so LOW. for my section, i think of the best deal of them could have been charged, had their young babies taken from them and given to somebody who cares, and that they would not have been allowed to pass away Portugal till they served their time. yet better previous due than never.
2016-10-16 10:03:25 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
sure are, telling people a biased side to form a favorable opinion of a company/person/object/etc. sounds like a propoganda machine to me.
2007-02-01 03:20:19 · answer #3 · answered by colera667 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, it's just a position to keep all the nosy parkers and people who can't work for toffee out of the hair of the real workforce who keep the cogs of commerce turning
2007-02-01 03:15:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it can be used to get propergander out there but there are better ways of using propergander to influence the public opinion like TV networks
2007-02-01 04:52:06 · answer #5 · answered by ben s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends how the PR is dealt with...actually I change my mind, yes.
2007-02-01 03:14:31 · answer #6 · answered by Saint 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Certainly! As opposed to "journalism," which is SUPPOSED to tell both sides of the story, or report facts neutrally.
2007-02-01 03:13:52 · answer #7 · answered by I hate friggin' crybabies 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a load of rubbish as for the media I do not believe a word they say.
2007-02-05 00:21:53 · answer #8 · answered by Ollie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES --- without Doubt -- They tell it as they want you to "Believe It" -- Not as It Really is --- A Coercive and Dubious Practice
2007-02-02 22:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well yes it is, depends on which side you look from
is the glass half empty or half full?
take care
2007-02-01 03:14:35 · answer #10 · answered by markos480 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋