I am sorry that is all you see. I have talk to a few on email and pages (who I am friends with) who have opposing views from me--but we are civil to each other. Some can not be civil-it is not their true nature.
I wouldn't generalize, or put down others because some think without an education they have no good views. That is shallow. And we all know not everyone who has schooling is a brain and many lack common sense-some are idiots still. But I see it go both ways with both parties the childish manner. Even some in our Government with their education don't know how to behave-on both sides. And some smooth talkers are the biggest lying snakes in the world.
I think it would be better if many did more listening than ranting.
2007-02-01 08:37:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7
·
7⤊
0⤋
Why do Democrats respond back in such a childish manner;when I state the horrible truth about their party?
From grow up junior to go get a job to foul words and insults,these Democrats folk are like broken records.Same thing,over and over...They don't know and I guess don't won't to know about world wide truths and facts about the war,the money,the death... I
repeated your question with just a few change words if you are going to ask a question try using a little intellect and facts if you really want to get some insightful answers.
2007-02-01 03:05:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ynot! 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Well from the questions you have asked, you come off like an ignorant fu(k to start with. I am no Republican but I would bet that there are just as many guilty Democrats as Republicans on this war issue. The difference being, when the Democrats seen the poll numbers they changed their tunes. Which to me means they do not have the conviction of their decisions. What ever the poll say today is what I am for. While Bush is no savior, hero, or even a good President, he has the conviction to stick with what he believes. Maybe if the Democrats and Republicans in Congress had the belief in their decision instead of the bright lights of 08 in their eyes this fu(king war would be over. Sad really. Politics before what is right for the people. Both sides are hypocrits!
2007-02-01 02:33:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by str8jacket2007 1
·
2⤊
1⤋
I advise that the better shrink for contributions be executed away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nonetheless proceed to be as they're, adjusted for inflation. Social protection isn't a "provide away" application yet one which all of us make contributions to love a value reductions plan, and could be shielded from different makes use of by skill of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so frightened approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it lower back into the internal maximum sector and make to have been no can take out funds from it for his or her very own activity, 2d pay lower back each and every penny you have borrowed from the two Social protection and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet by no skill paid a penny to it, and ultimately have it a similar for each man or woman; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they want something greater they do it on their very own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the financial stytem feeding the imbalances had by no skill been rather replaced. They, a team of pupils, mentioned that each and each physique costs of activity could be 3% or much less for each man or woman to develop into wealthy if needed (that ought to be actual additionally to taces). the terrific financial difficulty could be, they mentioned, while there have been no costs of activity. Why no longer try this answer? the wealthy might nonetheless be wealthy. My question is: while soial protection will become a difficulty linked to federal funds owed, why no longer artwork with a balanced or benefit budget and spend no better than is presented in, as any family contributors has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get regulations that serve the rustic? God bless usa.
2016-09-28 06:49:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by goodfellow 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is more than enough mudslinging to go around from both sides of the aisle.
I am neither Rep or dem....I do not blindly follow, I ferret out the truth for myself by doing research from reputable sources, which does NOT include: youtube, the new york times, yahoo answers, or any other blatantly bias outlet.
What you, and others like you state are your opinions - open to debate and disagreement. Opinions by their very nature, cannot be facts.....
Perhaps, if you chose not to temper your questions in a derogatory tone, your answers would reflect the same consideration....
2007-02-01 02:41:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by CrazyCatLady 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Post a real question based on facts. State some horrible truths--with facts to back them up, and let's see what happens.
Attacking the person on the other side is not a valid argument for your position, although it might give the people on your side a little snicker or two.
2007-02-01 03:47:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Take Responsibility 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I looked at some of your most recent questions. None of them had any "truth" in them, just opinions, i.e., yours. You give an opinion, you get opinions back. Just like many of us don't like your opinion, you might not like our opinion of your questions. If you want to try giving, oh say, facts...then you might get some true discussion back.
Examples of YOUR questions:
Why do Republicans outnumber Democrats in the political section of Yahoo Answers??? - Opinion...not backed by fact -
Why don't Republicans care about the future well being of our one and only planet??? - Opinion...not backed by fact -
Why are most Republicans extremely racist??? - Opinion...not backed by fact -
How can you ever vote Republican again;when you have seen how horrific your party truly is??? - Opinion...not backed by fact -
Are you Republicans proud of the money spent and lives lost during this horrible Iraq war??? - Not even an opinion...just rhetoric -
2007-02-01 03:20:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by kathy_is_a_nurse 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Truth ?.. Ain't it such a relative term?.. Truth to liberals are not truth to conservative..
Remember buddy, consensus does not mean it is the truth. It just means you were smart enough to convince some idiots what you believe. if you are really saying the truth, why are you so concerned about what other have to say?.. did you actually expect everybody to agree with what ever you say? (oh I forgot, you are a liberal and you do)..
2007-02-01 02:30:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mail J 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
Most people go into denial when you state horrible truths to them. Look at Democrats when you state horrible truths about their party. Just about the same I think.
2007-02-01 02:29:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Doug 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I think that die-hard members of ANY political party are going to support their party, right or wrong. This is a very unhealthy stance and is absolutely the attitude that got a moron like Bush into the White House.
2007-02-01 02:31:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by jfellrath 3
·
1⤊
2⤋