about adoption of children
2007-02-01 02:08:31 · 5 answers · asked by pop 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
They are different when it comes to adoption. Angelina, when she had just adopted Zahara and Maddox, she had handled the entire procedure with patience and care. Madonna handled it with her usual drama queen act.
2007-02-01 02:31:14 · answer #1 · answered by sPrInG LiLY 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there's much of a difference at all. I think these children will have a better life. But it makes me wonder what Madonna's and Angelina's motives were in adopting children from foreign countries instead of the United States.
2007-02-01 02:29:22 · answer #2 · answered by Joshua 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Respectability. I would let Angelina adopt long before I would let Madonna, if it were up to me.
2007-02-01 02:13:55 · answer #3 · answered by OOO! I know! I know! 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Nothing, they both do it out of vanilty, getting a little exotic, more like pets or fashionable accessories than as human beings. Still, they may be vain sl*ts, but those kids will be better off growing up that way, and they can do therapy later on.
2007-02-01 02:17:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Angelina is sincere and did it from her heart, Madonne did it for Publicity
2007-02-01 02:28:40 · answer #5 · answered by BubbleGumBoobs! 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋