English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Defeating Islamic Terrorist ?
2. Defeating the Presidency of Bush?

2007-02-01 02:03:31 · 23 answers · asked by Mail J 3 in Politics & Government Politics

23 answers

Liberals are actually interested in force feeding you their socialistic ideals. They control the media, hollywood, recording companies, etc etc. Its real easy for them to give you a sublimnal mind f*ck just read the answers you got so far! fing terrorist, that's for sure, if they were they wouldn't be flooding the media every chance they can to denounce the war effort. As for defeating Bush...lol...Bush isn't running again, and the score card is Bush 2 Liberals 0....Lets win this war against terrorism, that was actually started by Bill Clinton, but was afraid to act! Go back to 1998, 1999, and 2000 to his WMD's speeches, which were also solidified by Kerry, Kennedy, Hillary, Richardson, Biden, Edwards, Dean, and many other Liberals in 2002 and 2003.That under THEIR own investigation, from their trusted sources, that WMD's which are biological and chemical in nature were there in Iraq. These speech's were made by them before the Bush lied to us! Especially listen to 2 speeches by Hillary, to code pink in 2002 and the others speeches on the senate floor 2002 and 2003. Dont be the lazy American Bush hater, without looking into what the media is feeding you. Those politicians words at the time was proof Bush didn't lie to them, because they had THIER own people doing an investigation.

2007-02-01 02:31:39 · answer #1 · answered by MRJERK715 2 · 1 2

TRy some Common sense. No one needs to defeat Bush. He is a personal failure. He defeats himself. Put yourself in the boots of one of our service members in Iraq. Now point at the "Islamic Terrorist" you want to kill. Common sense should tell you that the "Terrorist's" are cowards, no one but a fool thinks other wise. They will not stand and fight. They do the dirty work behind our backs. Just like In Nam.
Of the 34,000 Iraqi civilians killed last year alone in Iraq. How many were "Islamic terrorist"? You don't know. Our Government does not know. Bin Laden is in Afghanistan not Iraq. Bush invaded and now occupies the wrong country.

2007-02-01 02:29:56 · answer #2 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 2 0

Don't be stupid, just what are we fighting against? Liberals are interested in trying to get this ****-hole of a war to end as best as possible, since we can't force these people to embrace democracy, or fight against terrorists that blend in too well with the population. Dear God, how did this start? Maybe with WMDs...I mean 9-11....I mean Osama...I man Hussein....I mean spreading democracy...I mean so Bush Jr can do what Bush Sr. never got a chance to do with Bagdad. Liberals know that war can be inevitable, but there are rules that people follow for going into war. You don't just up and start a war over any half-assed reason.

2007-02-07 20:14:13 · answer #3 · answered by Alexis 3 · 0 0

Freedom,equality and justice! Not only for America but for the rest of the world..Only in this way can terrorism be defeated
and Presidents like Bush will not stand a chance to be elected !

2007-02-01 02:24:57 · answer #4 · answered by dadacoolone 5 · 3 0

Both 1 and 2 look good to me as a moderate. I can't speak for liberals but I can speak for myself. Besides those two issues I believe liberals want to ensure social security is safe, we have some sort of healthcare system that enables everyone to have good medical care, good schools, and a decent wage for everyone. By the way if we do number 2 we are well on our way to doing number 1 of your question choices.

2007-02-01 02:46:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I truly believe that the actions of the Bush presidency have created MORE terrorists throughout the world. What he has done so far has certainly not lessened the threat. We will never defeat terrorists whether they are Islamic or the homegrown Timothy McVeighs of the world. To think we can do it by invading countries is the height of ignorance. Terrorism is not confined by geographical borders.
I am a liberal who thinks our best defense against the growing threat of terrorism is for our government to learn to respect other religions and cultures and to quit trying to impose our beliefs on others in the world. Democracy is wonderful - but doesn't work for all.

2007-02-01 02:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by arkiemom 6 · 3 4

i admire how they assemble funds for needed government centers with low overhead and alter inflation to help stave off extra extreme improve-and-bust cycles. the money they assemble is going to the militia, securing the border, and the warfare on drugs so there is something so which you may love too! :) even nonetheless i became into unaware that the IRS served using fact the series corporation of the Federal Reserve. are you able to factor me in a course so i can study some extra approximately it? additionally, on an identical time as we are speaking approximately activities almost a hundred years in the past, are you able to tell me what you adore maximum approximately Jim Crow rules enacted interior the South following Reconstruction and repealed over the objections of conservatives between the Nineteen Thirties and the Sixties?

2016-12-13 06:07:17 · answer #7 · answered by cheng 4 · 0 0

1 1/2. Defeating foreign and domestic terrorists.

2007-02-01 02:17:27 · answer #8 · answered by Brotherhood 7 · 2 3

Restoring democracy to the point at which Bush took office . He seemed as if he was waiting for something to happen to kick start his presidency ,and he got it . Now some people might be a little suspicious of that . Funny when you poke a dog through a fence long enough and he is allowed to come into your yard is it any wonder you get bit . Bush wanted this war from the start of his presidency and thought it would forever place him in the history books as the savior of the world .
The use of many canards and his apostasy away from traditional conservative values has had an arrant effect upon this nation .

2007-02-01 02:15:08 · answer #9 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 7 4

Number 2.

Clinton had 6 years after world trade 1 to do something, the democrats only care about money, and power, for their elite few.

2007-02-06 20:32:47 · answer #10 · answered by impalersca 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers