ive read that the world trade center was the only steel buildings to come down due to fire ever!
and then it happend three times in one day
WOW what a coincidence
2007-02-01 01:35:51 · 13 answers · asked by ben s 2 in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
There's no doubt that the WTC Buildings were brought down demolition style.
The fire could not do that...Impossible...
Those who believe it was the fire, you fell into the trap in believing there orchestrated lies.
2007-02-01 01:52:34 · answer #1 · answered by Sabreen 2 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Why is it you imagine the gov. can participate in a masterfull, slick conspiracy and cover up ladden with issues that could flow incorrect, and can't finished a structure undertaking on time and fewer than budget? it type of feels to me people like you're purely attempting to anger generic and rational people and performance some laughs. it really is been reported and that i imagine you completly overlook the shown reality that 747 Airplanes were rocketed into the part of those homes @ 3-400 mph. That absolutely weakens the strutcure. also you understand those little face mask that fall from the ceiling in case the airplane depressurizes. what's that is going by skill of those lines so that you'll be able to breathe? Is that oxygen. ought to the airplane had oxygen tanks on board that ought to help gas those fires? also ought to there have been some medical doctors or dentists place of work round that ought to have had oxygen or a plethra of different bottled, pressurized and volitale chemical compounds? the reason your engine dosnt melt is because the tempature is regulated via the cooling gadget. maximum thermostats open between 100 and eighty- one hundred ninety and the followers come on everywhere from 210- 230. i love the perception of you draing your coolant and driving your automobile. also eliminate the oil. Bush probable made some funds off of it so that you ought to eliminate it in protest!
2016-12-03 07:50:20 · answer #2 · answered by haltom 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I know that there are so many unanswered questions about 9/11 and we probably will never know the answers...but as someone stated before in how many of the buildings with steel structure the fire started after a plane crashed into them and the fuel form the plane burned? That fuel can burn at very high temperature that could have melt the structure of the building...Again I believe that there is more to 9/11 then what we know,but those buildings could have very well collapsed because of the fire...
2007-02-01 03:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I suppose the question is whether many steel buildings ever had a fire in them of the heat and intensity generated by a Boeing full of aviation fuel, plus the mechanical damage to the building by the plane's impact.
Even more inconveniently for the theorists, there has been at least one collapse unconnected with 9/11...
2007-02-01 01:47:38 · answer #4 · answered by gvih2g2 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, but they're the only buildings to collapse after having almost fully-fuelled airliners flying into them kamikaze style.
Incidentally, to some of you, the fire from the explosions didn't have to melt the steel girders before the towers collapsed, they only had to heat them to the point the girders didn't retain enough tensile strength to be able to support the buildings' weights. Big difference..
2007-02-01 07:04:42 · answer #5 · answered by Huh? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The Hindenburg had a steel skeleton, that soon collapsed when it caught fire.
1..2..3..4..5 enter conspiracy theorists.
No the Hindenburg was not taken over by Islamic terrorists
2007-02-01 01:51:58 · answer #6 · answered by Corneilius 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Crystal palace in London was destroyed by fire and was essentially a giant Green house all Steel and glass as it was used for the great exhibition in 1851 it burnt down in 1936.
2007-02-01 01:46:55 · answer #7 · answered by hoegaarden_drinker 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No day in history had 2 planes fly into two steel structures on the same day either.
Maybe you didn't catch that part of the news.
2007-02-01 01:43:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
No listen yeah I watched a programme you see when you blow up a building like old houses there put explosive in every single one of them inside the building through out ,the same was in the WTC and even people said there can here the explosions , and there showed a close up on camera and you can see some like expolsions coming out as the buliding is coming down
2007-02-01 01:41:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
It wasnt brought down by fire the fire couldnt burn high enough to melt the steel of the buildings. Have u not seen the videos of bombs vbeing set of just before the collapse!!
2007-02-01 01:40:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋