The davinci code is fictional made up and highly over exaggerated. the truth is that davinci painted the last supper in the 15th century and Christ was around in 33Ad. the painting was dictated by his imagination and skill to paint something out of the bible which was out of context and has done a wonderful vivid imagination of what might have looked like in jesus's time.
2007-02-01 01:21:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Elvis 109 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well frankly I was not really shocked, the film makes sense if you think about it logically. It is true that modern people tend to question their beliefs. The Da Vinci Code is not the only book that have come up with this theory. I have read a book which was similar. The Templar Legacy.
2007-02-01 01:16:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Adora Belle Dearheart 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. that is fiction. The activities are fictional. Even many of the historic past is fictional. And in case you pay interest heavily there are issues that look authentic before each thing look yet they're not once you check out it. everybody who believes and spreads the "data" (Illuminati, Priory of Sion, etc.) are both completely gullible people or conspiracists.
2016-12-03 07:49:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by haltom 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good Movie, Better Book, All Fiction
2007-02-01 01:13:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
fun fiction ( based on myth/fact )
the fact that there was other Christian beliefs ( including the not so Divine Christ really sets off current Christians ( who use the Bible version approved by a very not divine king ) and that makes the whole thing worthwhile ( even though the child of Christ part has no historical basis )
2007-02-01 01:14:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a flashy, unengaging movie based on a thinly written book. The ideas contained in the book are intriguing, and deserve much better treatment. It was a first draft, and so was the movie.
2007-02-01 02:44:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought it was the most ungodly movie I have seen in a long time. That is something the writers of the movie will have to answer for on judgment day.
2007-02-01 01:41:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by ANGIE 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought the film to muchtime on the story and not enough on the codes
2007-02-01 01:28:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by soulburner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most certainly the biggest pile of bulls*it I had watched for many a year. Total rubbish, but then again, so was the book.
2007-02-01 01:13:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Superdog 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A rare instance that the movie was the book (in that both were rather bad)
2007-02-01 01:19:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋