English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-02-01 00:07:30 · 12 answers · asked by Indian wizard 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

12 answers

I lived in Pakistan during my childhood and teen hood. I saw that the Military establishment using the Indian bogey (evil or mischievous spirit; devil) to their own advantage. Poor Pakistani civilians believed these military leaders' false vow to 'save Islam' and 'save Pakistan' from external threats (mainly India) for many years. Even now the Military is chaperoning the civilian politicians in the conduct of running the state affairs from the backstage.

The then popularly elected leader from West Pakistan, Z.A. Bhutto, came to power in the Western part of Pakistan after his mischief to resist elected leader from East Pakistan, Sk. Mujib, to rule whole of Pakistan as the PM by the virtue of the constitutional provision and Sk. Mujib’s party Awami League achieving majority number of seats in the countrywide general election in 1970.

We saw that the debacle of Pakistan occurred when Bangladesh declared independence on 26th March 1971 after the West Pakistani military started their crackdown on un-armed civilian population of the then East Pakistan, resulted in armed-struggle by ‘Mukti Bahini’ with 99% support from the general populace of the then East Pakistan, and we got our victory on 16th December 1971, thanks to Indian Army and PM Indira Gandhi’s overt & covert help.

The irony of fate for Pakistan is that the civilian PM Mr. Nawaz Sharif and Ms. Benazir Bhutto miserably failed to lead this poor nation of brave people out of the dark military path to a saner and cleaner government-rule by the elected representatives. The two failed leaders (Nawaz & Benazir) were easily deposed by the Military establishment a number of times, without much resistance from the confused population.

These events would highlight as to who really controls Pakistan if not "To Whom does Pakistan belong to". The majority of the people in Pakistan (post-1971) are still led to believe that the Military people even at backstage maneuver are far better than all civilian rules. The people of Pakistan have now built-in belief in their psyche that the misrule of civilian PMs (Nawaz and Benazir) and their nepotism, corruption, mismanagement and resulting chaos were worse than the Military that had been ruling them on-and-off since its inception in 1947. It is a vicious cycle and the Military is taking full advantage of the situation.

I wish Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and all the 8-nations in the SAARC family a healthy and clean democracy soon!

2007-02-01 16:35:04 · answer #1 · answered by Hafiz 7 · 1 0

People of Pakistan.

2007-02-01 00:17:33 · answer #2 · answered by minootoo 7 · 0 0

certainly Pakistan belongs to three aces
A= Allah
A=Army
A= America

2007-02-01 00:43:20 · answer #3 · answered by mukul (still busy on a project) 4 · 0 1

while india and pakistan have been made separate countries, the king of kashmir desperate to maintain his state autonomous.He had desperate to not merge with india or pakistan. as every physique knows, pakistan is a rogue state. They invaded kashmir in 1948, began looting kashmiris, burning their residences, raping kashmiri females. so the king of kashmir requeseted pandit nehru to deliver indian military.Pandit nehru informed him to merge in india basically then the army may well be sent.basically while the king signed the settlement, the indian military became into sent to kashmir to combat the butchers. at that factor the flexibility of indian military became into not plenty. they could basically avert the onslaught of pakistani military even nonetheless it could have been very confusing for them to recapture the land pakistani forces occupied. So nehru went to UNO. Uno introduced status quo, informed the two the countries to withdraw the army from the land and take the mandate of kashmiri human beings. India refused to withdraw the army using fact the king of kashmir had signed the settlement with india.Pakistan refused to withdraw the army using fact any rogue and a rowdy united states will by no skill supply up something that they have captured illigally.On good of it, to coach a lesson to india, pakistan proficient an element of the land to china(land hungry united states). while pakistan became into created, very almost 2 lakh muslims in indian military desperate to be an element of pakistani military and india became into left with eqivalent arm forces. So it became into ideal on nehrus area to take up the undertaking with UN.Now why UN gave this variety of humorous verdict?it is via the fact pakistan became into formed as a rustic with the reward of united statesa. and britan.Pakistan became into an element of NATO from 1947 and UN became into completely motivated by way of united statesa. and britan.

2016-12-13 06:02:28 · answer #4 · answered by fechter 4 · 0 0

Every nation belongs to its own people as much as your nation belongs to you.

2007-02-01 00:13:46 · answer #5 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 0 0

It belong to military.

2007-02-01 07:41:06 · answer #6 · answered by Talha 4 · 0 0

The Pakistanis..

2007-02-01 00:10:40 · answer #7 · answered by okgogeo 2 · 0 0

It's a sovereign nation as is Nepal.

2007-02-01 03:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

To the Muslims!!! Allahuh Akbar!!!

2007-02-01 00:14:26 · answer #9 · answered by Sakky 4 · 2 1

with bin laden

2007-02-01 00:32:09 · answer #10 · answered by keral 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers