... as Bin Laden had his pilots train IN THE U.S. for 9-11?
Is this a top Democrat Acheivement? And, a fine example of peace nirvana?
2007-01-31 23:35:03 · 17 answers · asked by junglejoe 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
There is nothing from 1992 until 2000 I miss regarding the Clintons... Scandal from day one... inept leadership, poor national security, poor economic policy.. ( NAFTA, let's auction our American jobs to the lowest bidder)
The sad thing about all this is, we are on the verge of having her as President all over again!!!
2007-01-31 23:39:52 · answer #1 · answered by damond h 6 · 4⤊ 8⤋
Though there is no doubt that the terrorist attacks were a result of 3/4 of a century of U.S. policy, Clinton's weak presidency in the last days is the reason Bin-Laden was capable of pulling off 9/11. His cabinet sacrificed all of the lives on 9/11 just to preserve his legacy.
Secondly, I'm not looking forward to Hilary as president all the while slick willy makes her look a fool while running around with 21 year old girls.
I can't fathom her as president. Never mind I hate her positions but I can't imagine the president of my beautiful country with a cheating husband while she holds office.
2007-01-31 23:56:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Oh another president hating troll.
(What is your stance on Bush Bashers?)
Bin Laden was plotting against the west BEFORE Clinton made it to office.
Clinton did botch a few attempts at dealing with bin Laden - so has Bush.
Fighting terrorists is not a partisan game.
What is it with you anti-Bush & anti-Clinton trolls? Are you really that shallow and one dimensional?
2007-01-31 23:49:18 · answer #3 · answered by Bad M 4 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Yes, but I miss the two minutes of my life that I lost reading your question more.
2007-02-01 05:52:51 · answer #4 · answered by Jamie C 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean,,,that there is a chance that Bush didn't cause 9-11? I thought everyone was blaming Bush for everything including the great flood in the book of Genisis.
2007-01-31 23:42:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋
It is blissful putting on our ostrich outfits and still our heads in the sand. Soo peaceful. .
2007-02-01 00:02:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I can't stand hypocrites who post right-wing sound bites without researching history to see exactly what anti-terrorism legislature Clinton actually tried to get passed by a Republican majority congress in the 90's. The Republican congress was too busy trying to impeach him on trumped-up charges as they stonewalled and watered-down all his anti-terror proposals, of which there were many.
2007-01-31 23:46:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 3⤋
More so than the days of Bush who claims anyone who disagrees with his policies is a terrorist. By the way The U.s. is who trained Bin-Laden Or Have You forgotten He worked for The C.I.A.?
2007-01-31 23:40:06 · answer #8 · answered by bisquedog 6 · 9⤊ 4⤋
How about under Bush when Osama DID kill 1000s of Americans?
2007-01-31 23:50:30 · answer #9 · answered by ck4829 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
No because why live in the pass when you can live in the present?!?!?
2007-01-31 23:57:52 · answer #10 · answered by Kyla 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋