http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070201-121837-7232r.htm
As a Democrat, I think he should, he is a moron. GO OBAMA!!!
2007-01-31 23:17:35 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
What a waste of time and money it is for Biden to run. I don't think he should withdraw due to his remarks, I just think he should buy a vowel and get a clue. He doesn't have a chance of being elected.
2007-01-31 23:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No I dont think he should. I am saying this as a Democrat also. There was nothing he said that was false or a lie. He spoke his mind. Big deal, so it wasnt very PC. He was right about Hillary Clinton right about John Edwards and right about Obama. Go back and look at what he said again, it really wasnt all that bad. I mean in a world today where you have to watch what you say and be careful of not offending everyone, this just makes me like the guy more. Including what he said about 7-11's.
2007-01-31 23:41:33 · answer #2 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yea he should definitely withdraw for committing a PC crime during an interview.
That's far more important than his stance on issues, views and personal integrity.
After all wouldn't you rather have a nice PC president than a competent leader who has a clear vision for the country?
/end sarcasm
i don't see any reason for him to withdraw, I'm not sure he's a worthy candidate but why pull out now?
As for your boy Obama, I'd really like to see something of substance from him, and introducing a bill that would have no measurable effect on the war in Iraq while Bush is in office doesn't count.
2007-01-31 23:37:27 · answer #3 · answered by Malikail 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I propose that the better shrink for contributions be finished away with, and that the optimal payouts in retirement nevertheless stay as they are, adjusted for inflation. Social risk-free practices isn't a "provide away" software yet one that all of us make contributions to love a value savings plan, and could be risk-free against different makes use of by potential of the government. Do you compromise or disagree and why? while you're so hectic approximately it then why do no longer you; first positioned it back into the non-public sector and make to have been no can take out money from it for their own interest, 2d pay back each penny you have borrowed from the two Social risk-free practices and Medicare, third take the unlawful immigrants off of it and people who come over right here yet on no account paid a penny to it, and finally have it the comparable for each individual; in different words government officers are to take part in it and in the event that they choose for something extra they do it on their own without the tax payers investment it?yet, the economic stytem feeding the imbalances had on no account been somewhat replaced. They, a team of scholars, pronounced that everyone expenses of interest could be 3% or much less for each individual to advance into rich if needed (that would desire to be real additionally to taces). the suited financial concern could be, they pronounced, whilst there have been no expenses of interest. Why no longer try this answer? the rich could nevertheless be rich. My question is: whilst soial risk-free practices turns right into a concern linked to federal money owed, why no longer artwork with a balanced or earnings fee variety and spend no extra advantageous than is obtainable in, as any relatives has to try for? Why no longer ban all loobying presents with a view to get rules that serve the country? God bless united states.
2016-12-16 18:30:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think in a democracy any lunatic should be allowed to run.
The liberal bedwetting moonbat Al Frankenstien is running in Minnesota against a great Republican.
And the far left wing muslim Osama Obama Hussien is running against the far left wing lunatic Hillary who appeases her "husband" that abuses young school girls.
Let the moron run..
2007-01-31 23:55:15 · answer #5 · answered by Feelsgood 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, he should withdraw from the presidential race because he has no more chance of getting the nomination than I do.
2007-01-31 23:22:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If every politician who ever said something stupid left politics, we'd be seriously short on politicians. Even the all-powerful Obama (I love him too) will have his day where he'll say something dumb. It's in politicians' blood, I think.
I say don't get too worked up over any one thing anybody says.
2007-01-31 23:21:30 · answer #7 · answered by Jeremy E 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You have got to give it to him. One of his first comments after announcing his run for the Presidency, was slamming the Democrat candidates on their views about what needs to be done in Iraq. In the process he got his own foot stuck in his mouth. I think it was great, his first day out and he gets foot in mouth disease.
2007-01-31 23:26:54 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well it was a condescending remark regarding another candidate unknown in American politics.
2007-01-31 23:44:11 · answer #9 · answered by Ibredd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All I know is that if he was a Republicans the Democrats would be calling for his resignation.
2007-01-31 23:33:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋