Do you think he is guilty of anything related to this?
If he is, what do you think the implications will be?
2007-01-31 22:45:45 · 6 answers · asked by footynutguy 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Doesn't surprise me, but I eagerly await for him to be taken from Downing Street in handcuffs followed by his charity robbing b*tch.
2007-01-31 23:15:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who knows? He wasn't interviewed "under caution" and without a lawyer, so although he is a "witness" he doesn't seem to be a suspect. I don't see how it could have bypassed his knowledge really, but then again I don't have an intimate knowledge of the honours system. It will affect his legacy whatever way though, public opinion already has judged him guilty, but no one really cares as we all know its happened since the dawn of British politics anyway.
Only one solution which will sort all of this of course - Elect the Lords!
2007-02-01 06:56:39 · answer #2 · answered by Nightowl 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should go now !
Is he guilty? - almost certainly, but it is a question of proving it.
Implications - Nothing - he's untouchable - plod hasn't a chance against old Balony Blair!
2007-02-01 07:27:46 · answer #3 · answered by LongJohns 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Something definitely stinks about this. I don't think Blair will be charged though, it's a shame really. I'd love to see him taken from number 10 in handcuffs. While we are at it lets charge him for his war crimes too. Wishful thinking, i know.
2007-02-01 11:53:12 · answer #4 · answered by jezza 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He probably hasn't done anything that hasn't been done before.That doesn't mean that this government isn't the most sneaky, manipulative two faced administration that we have ever had
2007-02-03 14:14:35 · answer #5 · answered by Robin C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should just about be able to hear the cell keys clinking by now!
2007-02-02 15:50:02 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋