seems to me all cameras in dc , no good pics of plane hitting building see little hole in building
2007-01-31 16:05:10 · 19 answers · asked by shitsueu 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
good i mean cleer pics of plane hitting building pentagon should have more cameras in place security cameres like wallmart does ?? i hour after attecks started
2007-01-31 16:56:50 · update #1
That question is kind of an oxy-moron - it's like opting for a front-row seat at an autopsy - I mean, do you really want to get up-close and personal to something like that?
2007-01-31 16:19:11 · answer #1 · answered by inquiring black beauty 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Wow! Wouldn't you be a little suspicious of a guy with a camera that just happened to be standing out back of the Pentagon on that day ready to take photos or film. I mean this side of the Pentagon has very little meaning other than a secondary parking lot. Gee....If there was a guy there with a camera, I would say he knew before and didn't tell anyone. And lets see...that plane was moving at about 250 mph, that's a little hard to photograph from a stand still security camera that takes a clip every second.
2007-01-31 16:11:03 · answer #2 · answered by bamafannfl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one was expecting an arcraft to be flown into the Pentagon at the moment it happened. So it's not terribly suprising that there was no one with a camera trained on the Pentagon at the precise moment, & at the optimum angle to get a good picture.
The smaller than aircraft sized hole is due to the fact that the wings usually fold back, & shear off when an aircraft gets driven into a solid object at high speed.
2007-01-31 16:12:33 · answer #3 · answered by No More 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I've often wondered that myself... all we really had were lead in's from the news. And when 9-11 is mentioned, it seems to be all about the Twin Towers. (not to take anything away from the travesty there..) but you are right. Where are the photos? And the tapes? Good question.. now I'll be up all night..
2007-01-31 16:20:25 · answer #4 · answered by nachtrieb2 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because the FBI quickly grabbed up all the film from the cameras that did capture what DID hit it. Like the one from the gas station. They don't want you to see the truth. If they did...why not release THOSE tapes??
2007-01-31 16:18:31 · answer #5 · answered by TexasRose 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The airplane did no longer end on the outermost ring of the Pentagon. It persevered into the indoors earrings. lots of the airplane grew to become into destroyed for the period of the explosion. The keeps to be of the airplane could have been buried below the rubble. for this reason, that's no longer likely that any of the photos taken could incorporate any easily identifiable areas between the smoke and fire.
2016-11-23 19:20:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No one had a camera focused on the pentagon. Did you know all the footage we got from the first WTC tower being hit was pure timing? Someone had their camera going, interviewing a fireman (I believe) and that's when it all started.
2007-01-31 16:10:08 · answer #7 · answered by evenstar8723 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Cub reporter and camera man Ted Olsen was with Louis Lane.
2007-01-31 16:13:48 · answer #8 · answered by Sgt 524 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/05/16/pentagon.video/
2 camera views.
Link in the middle of the report. They zoom in on the plane, and then also shows pictures of shredded pieces of the plane.
NEXT CONSPIRACY THEORY!
2007-01-31 16:15:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea, geez... why didnt people focus+aim there cameras more?
its not like the biggest terrorist strike since pearl harbor just happened.
some say its worse because it targeted civilians...
people prolly shoulda payed more attention to getting better angles on their camera shots of the Pentagon being hit!
stop reading that michael moore crap!
the dudes a looney!
2007-01-31 16:10:16 · answer #10 · answered by Corey 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋