what is your political view about marxism and hegelian?

Answer 1

هل استطيع التعرف علي فتاه جميله من صنعاء اليمن؟?

Answer 2

Well Hegelianism was pretty much hijacked by a leftist peoples such as Marx, Engels and Schopenhauer (quite a hippocrite that guy ).
The saying 'Those who dont remember history are doomed to repeat it' could at least somewhat describe Hegel's dialectic.

Marx who had been reading the Essence of Christianity took Hegel's historicism and came up with his alienation theory regarding things which he thought were in harmony were being disrupted such as the worker and their work being disrupted by Capitalism or that God alienated the characteristics of the human being.

Of course people like Nietzche would agree with things anti god and influence more than a few atheists.

So from what was considered to be a conservative philosopher spawned Marxism and with it the idea that god and capitalism were things to avoid because they took you away from your harmonial purpose.

Of course communism in the Marxist doesn't seem to take into consideration that its human nature to get ahead , to compete, and to be different than everyone else.

Competition in a free market leads to progress. That is a fact and that essence of Capitalism some don't want to believe.

We just need to make sure its an even playing field for the competition.

Answer 3

II think we do best to reject the underlying theme of a progressive historical dialectic both Marx and Hegel put forth. Fukiyama attempted to justify neo-liberal capitalism using Hegel's theories, and even claimed we were at the end of history. What we saw on September 11th was the "end of the end of history" and the beginning of a new epoch - this one marked by the clash of religion and secularism, Christianity and Islam, modernity and tradition. The Iraq War served to cement this new epoch - the direction of this new epoch was in flux until the day of the invasion, but cannot be reversed now.

September 11th negated the victory of neo-liberal capitalism over communism and Iraq negated the possibilities for peace opened up by September 11th and the defeat of the Taliban.

Marx's critiques of capitalism are still valid - for those who care to read them. Look at census data on the distribution of wealth, think about outsourcing, Enron, etc. These are all phenomena Marx explicated throughout his writings. His mistake was to view the answer as purely economic - who owned the means of production. What he failed to see is that our attitude toward capital accumulation was what needed to change - he never addressed the spiritual vacuum of gluttony. Hence the Soviet Union really amounted to state-run capitalism. The condition and role of the worker, specifically to utilize his or her energy to create wealth for someone else, never changed because the Soviets still worked within the paradigms of capital - more is better, and much more better still.

Answer 4

I thought we done away with those principles already. I don't think much of them.

Seems like only democracy/capitalism and a few lukewarm socialist and communist countries exist.

They realized capitalism is it. They may still call themselves by any other name but practice good old opportunistic capitalism anyway while still keeping their citizens in check.

Actually, I think that's the type of democracy Bush was heading for before November 7th.

India's caste system still survives despite leanings toward democracy, but that too will go away with some effort from the victims.

Answer 5

Marxism is a failed economic-political system, philosophically and by world example (Soviet Union), and if my memory is correct, Hegel was an O.K. guy.

Answer 6

Hegalian what? Hegalian is an adjective not a noun.
Marxism was never tried in the world. Communism in the USSR was not Marxist, it was a dictatorship, not a proletariat government.