Republicans, do you think these two men are too moderate to lead the Republican party and possible, the country? Would you prefer someone who's further to the right, like Romney?
Non-Republicans can feel free to comment as well.
2007-01-31 15:05:14 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I believe it's time for moderates to take back the Republican Party, and it's time for moderates to take back America.
Also, McCain is hardly moderate... he's center-right, at absolute best. That doesn't mean I wouldn't vote for him, but calling him "moderate" is stupid.
So, if Ann Coulter doesn't like "moderates", she can go join the Constitution Party. I, as a Republican, really don't want to be associated with her.
2007-01-31 15:13:43 · answer #1 · answered by Richardson '08 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Ann Coulter is a stunningly beautiful, articulate BLOND, and the blogbaba confesses to haveing a harmless school boy like crush on the woman, she is entertaining in a comical way. (I hope my wife of 23 plus years don't see this confession). I truely believe that She and Michael Moore could take the human race to never before heights and put Brad and Angelina's baby on the back page of most tabloids if they were ever blessed with a child.
I have to tell you that the Blogbaba is currently attempting to get another Clinton in the White House, (I go for brains as well as looks, and if Hillary looked like Ann, or Ann had a fraction of Hillary's brains, either would rule the world). Still in all fairness, I will tell you, after the way **** Chaney crushed Wolf Blitzer, I believe **** is the best hope for the Republicans keeping the White House. Rudy, McCain, Jeb in truth none of the current crop of Republicans can measure up to ****. It wouldn't take that much more money or politicking to convince the American public they need four more years of ****. In truth American's (especially in Ohio) can't seem to get enough of ****. I know Wolf Blitzer knows what it's like to be on the receiving end of Chaney's ire. We have never seen **** harder than the stare he gave Blitzer, he wilted the reporter, and scared the daylights out of anyone watching.
But enough joking, Chaney really is the best Republican choice for President, if he took Jeb as his Vice Presidential running mate and took a shot at the White House, he would have a reasonable chance of beating Hillary. Any other Republican is going to have his elephant handed to him by who ever the Democrates run for the White House.
2007-01-31 15:44:36 · answer #2 · answered by blogbaba 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rudy already had his fifteen minutes of popularity and carried quite a number of bags before 911. in reality everybody else, had they been Mayor of long island city on the time, ought to have finished purely as solid a job, if not a better effective one, less than the situations. Rudy isn't my idea of a available president anymore than the present one. I not in any respect pay a lot interest to McCain yet he's not presidential cloth both.
2016-12-03 07:36:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
My 1st choice is Brownback. I like Giulliani but I doubt if he can get the nomination. McCain is allright but I think Rudy has a better temperment for the job. McCain will also have trouble with the base in primaries. I'm not sure where Romney stands, in fact I don't know if Romney knows where Romney stands.
2007-01-31 15:27:51 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a republican I am open to both candidates ideas and beliefs on the issues that America faces. Ann Coulter herself and her extreme views only, and not what is best for the party.
2007-01-31 15:39:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am an independent, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain are way too far right for me as is Mrs Clinton. I would rather vote for Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan, I like Pats foreign policies and his Ideas on Imigration and Naders domestic Policies. they should run on the same ticket, I think they would win.
2007-01-31 15:14:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I would not vote for either one of them just because what they stand for: The status quo; although Giuliani is liberal while McCain is to the right of moderation. Either way I'll vote for a 3rd party candidate or the Dem, depending on whom gets the nomination.
2007-01-31 15:14:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I saw that piece on Fox news tonight. My views are similar to those of McCain and Giuliani. I cannot stand the far right and most of the left (notice-not all but most of the left). I would vote for either of them. Coulter is too polarizing a figure to take seriously.
2007-01-31 15:13:03 · answer #8 · answered by Beachman 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
Speaking as a Democrat from the South, neither of these guys are well received by social conservatives in my neck of the woods.
Which is just fine with me, especially if Giulliani gets it, because it will keep the theocrats home on election day.
2007-01-31 15:17:14 · answer #9 · answered by neooxyconservative 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Coulter is a skinny-n-bone, don't care what she vote for.
09 will be a good era for America, nightmare will be over for so many millions.
While rejoice, please don't forget what the rebellion votes in the last two elections can cost.
2007-01-31 15:27:20 · answer #10 · answered by Bill H 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋