A 1995 Camaro or a 1986 Cutlass Supreme both V6 both stock.
2007-01-31 14:33:12 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Other - Cars & Transportation
I'd go with the cutlass supreme.
The 1995 Camaro (stock) only came with a 3.4 Liter engine that produced only 160 HP.
I don't recall if the Supreme came with a 350 or a 400 but it was a powerfull car.
The biggest advantage that the Camaro would have is that it was lighter.
2007-02-03 17:28:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1986 Cutlass Supreme, stock, can be very slow with 0-60 times as bad as 13 to 15 seconds. I believe the camaro was around 7-10 seconds in the 0-60 times. I believe the camaro was also lighter than the cutlass so i guess when you do the math the camaro should win.
2007-01-31 15:19:47 · answer #2 · answered by Eric A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Assuming that both drivers new how to race, both cars were automatic, I would place my money on the Camaro for the following reasons:
1- the areodynamics of the chev are much better.
2- the camaro's were always intended to go fast (race) wereas the cutlass (although prime machines in the days of the 442) are now meant for folks (30-50) who wanted a some what full size car that was classy & yet not that big. (easier to park)
2007-01-31 14:49:37 · answer #3 · answered by dlb_biker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the camaro.. theyre both 3.8 for displacement but i think the one in the camaro makes 200 hp and the older one is probably 140 at best
2007-01-31 14:49:24 · answer #4 · answered by red77chevy350 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lancer, no offense yet she has a smaller motor vehicle and a greater moderen one, so which you have lost a number of you horsepower via the years, she has keept maximum of hers, additionally she gets you off the line, i say save your money and dont race her
2016-11-23 19:04:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
depends on the driver.
2007-01-31 16:08:25 · answer #6 · answered by Skull 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the one with me driving :)
2007-01-31 14:36:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋