What is it going to take for the American people to stand up and impeach this lying president?

Question

Just imagine if he started a war with Iran

Answer 1

I know how you feel. Everything is just propaganda. NO PROOF but he decided to go to war anyway. every day I hear the word terrorist at least 50 times nuclear weapons 50 times. All they say they want is nuclear power for energy. Its ok for us to have nukes for weapons or energy. look North korea has nukes why are we just focusing on iran and iraq? we are taking sides with israel. I wonder why we let Israel attack lebonan arent we trying to stop terrorism? Is it right for Isreal to attack over 2 solders when Israel has 100s of lebonese prisoners. If our media says something long enough people are going to believe it. (brainwashing). If bush says Iran or Iraq is a threat people are going to believe him, at least some of us.
YOU CAN FOOL SOME PEOPLE SOME OF THE TIME BUT NOT ALL OF US ALL THE TIME.
now I wonder if the feds are reading this LOL I hope not

Answer 2

A couple of problems. He is such an arrogant fool, that he stands in the face of congress and says that he will make the final decision on Iraq. Congress can cut funding and bring everyone home fairly soon, but in the mean time, it will also cut a lot of their support. So that makes congress look bad, even though nearly 70% of Americans want the war to end.
Another problem is that even if congress does cut funding, Bush will veto any such action, and there may not be enough support to override his veto.
He should indeed be impeached. Clinton was impeached for lying to a grand jury... Bush has.... well, too many bad things to list.
Now about Iran... once again, his arrogance will lead us into expanding the war into Iran. It has nothing to do with terror, but has everything to do with removing a maniac from power. If you thought that Saddam was bad, the Iranian president is a serious nut case.
The critically bad thing is that we just don't have enough troops to fight a war on two fronts. If you want to see US casualties triple, just move into Iran.
If he really wants to stop Iran, a few well placed bombs during an air strike should do the trick. But he can't wait too much longer.
Iran is a much more serious threat than Iraq ever was and they really need to be stopped. The Iranian president is like Hiter was in the 1930's. Irans nuclear program has got to be stopped, or there could be serious consequences for the entire region.

Answer 3

probable, yet no longer unavoidably. A president can in basic terms be impeached for committing "treason, bribery, or different intense crimes and misdemeanors" in accordance to the form. mendacity to the time-honored public isn't possibly a intense crime, yet while the president develop into below oath then that could count huge variety (that's what have been given Clinton). of direction, that is to no longer say that Bush won't be able to be impeached, in basic terms that he probable won't be able to be impeached for mendacity suitable to the Iraq conflict. He has carried out lots of alternative issues that particularly no longer less than skirt impeachment territory.

Answer 4

What did he lie about? As I recall a whole lot of senators and congressmen voted to give him the authority to enforce the UN resoloutions regarding Iraq up to and including force. HIllary was even one of these and she had access to all of the intelligence the same as the rest of congress, that indicated Saddam had or was in the process of acquiring WMD's. Please dont forget that it was 4-5 months after congress passed the resoloution giving the president this authority that military action was taken. All that would have been required to difuse the situation to the UN and US satisfacton at that time would have been for Saddam to allow the inspectors back into Iraq to verify what he had or did'nt have. If the guy at the bank has his finger in his coat pocket and says he has a gun are you going to discount the notion that it isnt real because you have'nt seen it? Actions were taken for the threat that was at hand real or imagined and it was based on the best information that was available at that moment. If you are going to hold the president in contempt than you must include the congress as well. Back off and get over it.

Answer 5

Rosa ... The premise of your question is incorrect. Furthermore, even though both houses of Congress are now controlled by the Democrats, we don't see anyone proposing articles of impeachment, do we? No, of course not.

If you feel you have grounds for impeachment of the President, start by contacting your legislators. But, to tell the truth, I think you may not even know who your legislators are. Do you?

If all else fails, organize protests against the Congress. After all, they're the only ones who can prefer articles of impeachment against the President.

And if THAT doesn't get you the satisfaction you feel you deserve, then just run for president yourself. How about that?

Good luck, Rosa ... You're going to need it.

Answer 6

War with Iran seems inevitable if the democrats do win in 2008.

Bush claims that there are no talks of war against Iran, and since he seems to spew out what he is going to do no matter what people think.... I think he's telling the truth.

What will it take for people to stand up? Well the way it seems is people are investing in more products that make it quicker and easier to sit down, or investing in objects that you can sit down to enjoy. It'll take a lot.

So you people are just going to hang out at the computer and ask this same question a million times, in different wording, until you have the next president to pick on. An on going smut board that will be doomed with this same cycle. History truly does repeat itself. Copy and paste this statement, reopen it in 2010.

Answer 7

The first step would be to have a reason.

I think he believed that Saddam had WMDs. Turns out he was probably wrong. That was a mistake, not a lie.

But now that there's chaos in Iraq, if the US pulls out and lets it go into civil war, millions of people are going to die, and Iraq will absolutely become a haven for folks who hate the west. At this point there isn't really any other option but do whatever it takes to stabilize Iraq.

War sucks.

Answer 8

Number1. It takes an act of congress to do an Impeachment after a majority petitions for it! My question to you is, With our President elected to two terms, and yes he has made mistakes, Why would you think of this in the middle of his final term? Obviously you didn't vote for him., However the majority did, that is called a democratic system. Just to let you know, I wasn't real thrilled with Jimmy Carter or Bill Clinton. I work construction in Florida and the Clinton NAFDA agreement Screwed us!

Answer 9

Why bother. We couldn't even impeach Slick Willie. All it did was waste a lot of taxpayer dollars and congressional time . If you don't own 60 senators you can't pull it off. The 41+ plus minority will always vote in unison to block you, esp. if it keeps their guy in the White House.

Answer 10

impeachment does not mean jack squat. its like going in front of a grandjury all it does is say wether or not there is enough evidence to have a trial.

also impeachment takes 2 years