what do u think??
2007-01-31 14:27:30 · 17 answers · asked by tavomanomusu 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
No. That land belongs to Israel and was given to them by God. You can't use the argument that the Palestinians were there first because every nation had someone there before them. They already have a home nation in Jordan. The majority of the people in Jordan are Palestinians and they should move to Jordan to be with their own people and become a part of the nation by getting elected so as to have a voice.
2007-01-31 14:37:15 · answer #1 · answered by ? 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
LET THE POWER OF ENCHANTED RING ENLIGHTEN YOU...Simply put yes! Jewish tradition holds that the Land of Israel has been a Jewish Holy Land and Promised land for four thousand years, since the time of the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob). There were more Arabs than Jews in the area during this time. Many hundreds of years of conflict between Jewish and Arabic factions along with the Jewish Holocaust caused Britian (the last conqueror of the area which considered Palestine a former colony) to mandate a creation of Israel within Palestine. The persecution of Jews in Europe by Germans and other European nations led to a mass migration of Jews to Palestine. The State of Israel was officially created in 1948 by a United Nations (any Arabs states represented?) mandate, however the Palestine area population was 70% Arab and 30% Jewish at this time. The constant conflict between the Israelis and Arabs is mainly due to the Western influence and support (financial and military). Palestinians have existed in the area just as long if not longer than the Jewish presence.
2007-01-31 15:31:03 · answer #2 · answered by GL Supreme 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Israel exists in the Middle East there is nothing we can do to change the fact,so I guess we will have to get used with this...
A Palestinian state should and has every right to exist,there is no doubt about this...and since Israel is not going anywhere,this Palestinian state should be created in the borders pre 1967,as everyone wants...As far as I am concerned they should go back to the UN partition plan from 1947...
2007-02-01 02:11:02 · answer #3 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lebanon was once a peaceful place where many cultures observed their religion there. It was happy and an open country. Then the terrorists came to make war w/Israel. Some Americans helped the radicals feeling they were the underdog but as soon as the rad Muslims got the upper hand, they began slaughtering the Americans because they were 'infidels'.
2007-01-31 14:51:21 · answer #4 · answered by spareo1 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No
1) There are no such people as "Palestinians". The term was invented in the 1970's for political reasons.
2) There are already more than 20 Arab countries. There is no need for any more.
3) Israel is entitled to secure borders. The 1949 armistice lines are not secure & never van be.
4) There are not enough resources west of the Jordan for 2 viable countries.
5) Jordan already has more than 3/4 of the land of the mandate of "Palestine".
If you need more reasons, let ne know.
2007-01-31 14:39:33 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Israel is tiny...ie Israel might greater healthful seventy six cases interior Iran Israel might greater healthful 20 cases interior Iraq Israel might greater healthful 4 cases interior Jordan Israel might greater healthful ninety cases interior Saudi arabia and greater importantly... Israel might greater healthful 40 six cases interior Egypt. you prefer tiny Israel to renounce territory to the Palestinians?? What approximately Egypt? instead of boxing them in Gaza...why do not they permit them to strengthen into the extensive Sinai Peninsular that's approximately 20 cases greater advantageous than Israel and specifically uninhabited.?? If the arab international, specifically Egypt and Jordan, love their muslim brothers lots, what's combating them from from allowing them residing area of their international locations. there is not any room in Israel! EDIT....There at the instant are not any components in Gaza and little or no in the west financial corporation section the two. The international locations of the international might pour in billions of dollars for housing and infrastructure if it meant a answer to the Palestinian challenge. it incredibly is all as much as Egypt to launch the human beings of Gaza from their self imposed reformatory and open up the Sinai to them. yet I heavily isn't holding my breath!
2016-10-16 09:38:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That wasn't their homeland .
There has never been a civilization or a nation referred to as " Palestine" and a " Palestine Arab nation" having ancient attachment to the Holy Land going back to time immemorial is one of the biggest hoax's ever perpetrated upon the world .
http://www.masad2000.org
2007-01-31 14:56:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think israel has the power and owns the land period ... if i was running israel i would give them two options ... chill out, disarm now and settle for what u have and become a part of our society ... or we're going to bulldoze u back to the neiboring arab countries borders and let them deal with u ...
2007-01-31 14:34:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. They should get a clue and move to either Egypt or Jordan. Get an education, get a job, live your damn life. Israel belongs to the Jews.
2007-01-31 14:32:28 · answer #9 · answered by aristocrat1.0@sbcglobal.net 1 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Didn't Arafat reject the 2 state peace solution?
2007-01-31 14:30:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋