Well it looked liked they were lying to us (maybe those tree hugging libs were telling us the truth)-Ya know it took Bush almost 4 years to acknowledge Iraq is basically a failure-ya think maybe he was lying hoping he could clean things up ...before we found out he was lying..well ya got a chickenhawk adm. who got us into this ...whaddya think would happen???
2007-01-31 14:18:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
how do we know its going well? No ragheads are killing people here
2007-01-31 14:21:24 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
your a pathetic media follower...
you have no idea what your talking about! lolll
he didnt say the war was a failure! he said that some things that happened in the war werent the best. the best implies perfection. He was trying to get the point accross that, yea there were some mistakes in the war... but thats not because he is a bad president, its because EVERY war has their handful of mistakes...He was trying to explain to you that every war has its handful of mistakes...and thats just war... people die too...
The thing about it is that the dem's blow up the few mistakes the president has made into huge ordeals. Even ones that never happened... or only exist in some peoples fantasies... like the fact we went to war so Bush's friends could have some more oil...
Do you understand how stupid that sounds? Seriously...
The war is going well.. no1 ever said anything about chaos except the anti-administration nutjobs...
2007-01-31 14:29:13 · answer #2 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Fox news has been critical of the way the war has been fought for two years now. You guys should try watching it once, instead of bashing it because your friends say it sucks. O'Reilly has been blasting Bush forever about how it was running the occupation of Iraq. You guys need to learn to research things for yourself, not just gossip in your dorm rooms.
2007-01-31 14:30:52 · answer #3 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
But wait--don't you remember the wonderful photo op of the Prez in a flight suit aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln, just off San Diego, turned just so, so it would look like it was far out at sea rather than barely out of port, and the huge banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished". ? Wasn't that photo really worth the two billion dollar$ a week the war has been costing? And the lives, well, they are after all just incidental. If they had been fetusses, or brain dead like that poor Florida woman, they would have counted. Politically. But real living flesh and blood humans? As the Prez said, "Bring Em On!".
2007-01-31 14:23:15 · answer #4 · answered by jxt299 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
i did not understand that Scott McClellan recommended Obama. it really is probable happy with Obama, regardless of the indisputable fact that it really is the habit of McCain supporters which will positioned Obama contained in the white residing house. McCain is a gorgeous good guy yet his supporters are torpedoing his marketing campaign.
2016-12-03 07:34:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, you are winning just over 2975 troops have die since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200612/s1818450.htm
Compared to about 46 000 civilian deaths in Iraq, yes you are winning!
2007-01-31 14:37:39 · answer #6 · answered by T C 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Here's two interesting tidbits that you won't hear about in the mainstream media:
The big battle (actually, an ***-kicking!) in Najaf. Close to 500 bad guys killed. A plot by Shi'ites wackos to kill Shi'ites thwarted. They were going to use children as suicide bombers. They were even going to try to pop al-Sistani, the BIG Shi'ite cleric.
A well-coordinated, almost surgical strike between US forces and the "bumbling, fumbling" Iraqi security forces.
And - get this - al-Sadr is looking for a deal. As the US forces are going to be increased, especially in Baghdad, he's looking for a truce. He has told his militia to back down when confronted by US forces. He has even told his forces that US troops will soon be in certain "hot spots" that he has, to this point, controlled with his militia.
I found that in a Bangor, ME newspaper!!
I am serious when I say that the mainstream media, in cahoots with liberals and Democrats, want us to LOSE!! If we win, they lose.
2007-01-31 14:24:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The war is going really good, just yesterday, we killed 260 insurgents, and only lost 1 helicopter, and 2 troops.
2007-01-31 14:21:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
My God, can you imagine what our enemies might think if this country could show the backbone to fight a war, and not whine about it?If for once we SUPPORTED our President and our TROOPS, we might just scare them to death if we could just shut the incessant liberal whiners up!
2007-01-31 14:47:52 · answer #9 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
well we were told by the president that the war was started because of faulty inteligence information. Wether you believe that is the case or not is one thing though.
2007-01-31 14:22:07 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
LOL! We won this thing years ago. Doesn't anyone remember Bush calling a press conference and saying "Mission accomplished!!"
Silly little cons and their delusions.
2007-01-31 14:25:39 · answer #11 · answered by Crybaby Conservatives 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋